- From: Heather Kreger <kreger@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:08:51 -0500
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Hi folks,
I was hoping to have some official F2F minutes to augment with my own
observations, but it looks like I'm on my own.
Wednesday:
Lifecycle - not too much discussion on technical content, but much
discussion on whether or not its part of core architecture, for now, not
core
Web service oriented architecture UML - not much discussion
Service Environment and Client Environment UML - much discussion, i think
there's more to be had here
Hosted Service UML - some discussion, more to be had by us and them here..
Discovery Agencies UML - proposed to add to discovery agencies details
little discussion
Thursday:
MTF progress charts:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Nov/0053.html
Concepts for W3C as discussed
Relationships with other standards bodies
Manager role
Walked through submission for arch document
Concerns:
1. too normative in wording, we'll soften it
2. too much detail for rest of the architecture - debate
here on if the rest of the arch will catch up to this level of detail,
those polled said yes. If we have too much detail it can be moved to a
separate document. Suggested adding a note at the front that there is more
detail on management because of the task force and that volume of
information is not an indication of importance.
3. move the example/realization to Management details
section
Nothing can be added to the draft till Talking Blocks/Mark Potts
declares IP, or lack thereof
MTF recharter
We have been recharted to work on the information consensus, Web
services client management, and a management primer
We are also expected to come back in January with a 'what should the
w3c do next
If we come back with too much detail then it will be passed to the
followon work
Heather Kreger
Web Services Lead Architect
STSM, SWG Emerging Technology
kreger@us.ibm.com
919-543-3211 (t/l 441) cell:919-496-9572
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2002 16:09:35 UTC