- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 13:26:21 -0400
- To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 07:47:14AM -0600, Champion, Mike wrote: > I think that's where "ontologies" come in. There would be some network of > assertions that knows that a "wardrobe" (in some culture, for some gender, > for some age, climate, etc.) consists of shoes, socks, trousers, shirt, etc. > I suppose that some other "ontology" would understand the process of > ordering clothing (determine size, find a supplier, negotiate a price, place > an order ...). The point, I guess, is that all these networks of assertions > can be processed by quite generic code -- rather than writing procedural > "buy a wardrobe" or "shop for shoes" code when a need for it arises, one > builds RDF data (linked to other ontologies on the Web). That's mostly correct. > More realistically, I would guess that the ontologies that one would develop > in the real world web services context would be at a much lower level. For > example, presumably WSDL could be replaced by an ontology for describing web > services invocation and responses, and a security markup language replaced > by an ontology for describing authentication, access control, encryption, > etc. Now you're talking. > I agree. I have a somewhat schizophrenic attitude toward this > stuff ... I would like to believe it will work, but it sounds > too much like AI things that I was excited about in grad school > 25 years ago (sigh) that were going to be big ... Real Soon Now. > Still, the thing I most clearly remember from my AI class > in 1977 is probably still true today -- this stuff works best > in quite limited domains (or what a colleague calls "the really > banal level" > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2002Feb/0045.html ) I personally despise AI, but also don't see the Semantic Web as having *anything* to do with it. Perhaps there's some overlap, I don't know or care. I just know that the Semantic Web helps me get my job done today, in a manner consistent with how the rest of the Web works (hypertext). Web services claim to be able to help me with these problems, but in a very similar way to other architectures that failed on the Internet (such as CORBA/OMA). If there are two ways to solve the same problem on the Internet, where one reuses Web architecture, and the other uses a failed (on the Internet) architecture, I know which one I'd choose every time. MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Sunday, 26 May 2002 13:17:37 UTC