- From: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 13:38:51 -0400
- To: wsawg public <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
D-AC011 IBM: Needs to say 'should be consistent with the existing web'. We must be careful with absolutes. As I've commented before, we should not be arbitrarily inconsistent, nor should we introduce inconsistency without extreme due diligence. However, we are standardizing a new capability to the web therefore the 'new' things may be inconsistent with the exisiting simply because they don't exist today. <proposal> Would adoption of the wording as proposed above be acceptable? </proposal>
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2002 13:41:51 UTC