RE: D-AG006 Security : Proposal for a task force for writing the Security WG Charter

Completing the Web Services Requirements and the Web 
Services Architecture Usage Scenario documents, which 
both contain security requirements and securty examples, 
in them is very important for any concrete work to be
done by a security working group.

However, we could, in parallel:

1) decide what Web Services WGs should we focus on?
2) define the objectives of the required W3C Web Services WGs. 
E.g., via charter templates. 

This is pretty much echoing what David already has 
proposed.

thanks,
Zahid



 

-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Hui [mailto:Joseph.Hui@exodus.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 4:45 PM
To: Mark Baker; Abbie Barbir
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: D-AG006 Security : Proposal for a task force for writing
the Security WG Charter


+1

Joe Hui
Exodus, a Cable & Wireless service
=============================================

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 3:26 PM
> To: Abbie Barbir
> Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: Re: D-AG006 Security : Proposal for a task force for writing
> the Security WG Charter
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 04:00:06PM -0400, Abbie Barbir wrote:
> > can we have a task force that write the charter for the Security WG.
> > I do volunteer to be the editor for that activity.
> 
> Shouldn't we try to at least come to concensus on security 
> requirements
> first?  Furthermore, we should aim to (at least) come to concensus on
> the "horizontal" requirements that would impact this work; Web
> architecture, for example.
> 
> This seems *highly* premature to me.
> 
> MB
> -- 
> Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc.
> Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.      mbaker@planetfred.com
> http://www.markbaker.ca   http://www.planetfred.com
> 
> 

Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2002 20:26:28 UTC