RE: D-AG0001-A - Conformance and Interoperability

Or may be a+ib (where i = sqrt(-1)) i.e. complex !:o)

3.1416... is analogous to our discussions ........... no finite end in
sight, infinitely long, orthogonal and never meets - like the rail
tracks :o)

cheers

 | -----Original Message-----
 | From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org 
 | [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Austin, Daniel
 | Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 7:40 PM
 | To: 'Krishna Sankar'; www-ws-arch@w3.org
 | Subject: RE: D-AG0001-A - Conformance and Interoperability
 | 
 | 
 | Er...Krisna...shouldn't that be +sqrt(-1)? Highly imaginary...
 | 
 | > -----Original Message-----
 | > From: Krishna Sankar [mailto:ksankar@cisco.com]
 | > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 7:58 PM
 | > To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
 | > Subject: RE: D-AG0001-A - Conformance and Interoperability
 | > 
 | > 
 | > +3.1416.... All architectures are interoperable and 
 | conformant at the
 | > architecture level !
 | > 
 | > cheers
 | > 
 | >  | -----Original Message-----
 | >  | From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org 
 | >  | [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jeff 
 | Mischkinsky
 | >  | Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:18 PM
 | >  | To: Mark Baker; Hugo Haas
 | >  | Cc: 'www-ws-arch@w3.org'
 | >  | Subject: Re: D-AG0001-A - Conformance and Interoperability
 | >  | 
 | >  | 
 | >  | +2
 | >  |    jeff
 | >  | 
 | >  | At 05:13 PM 3/20/02, Mark Baker wrote:
 | >  | >+1!
 | >  | >
 | >  | > > I believe that conformance testing will come to play for the
 | >  | > > technologies designed by other Working Groups started as 
 | >  | a result of
 | >  | > > the work of the WSAWG.
 | >  | > >
 | >  | > > I am all for interoperability and interoperability 
 | >  | testing, but I am
 | >  | > > unclear how that could be achieved at the architectural 
 | >  | level (I will
 | >  | > > be happy to have this clarified though). It would be 
 | > up to those
 | >  | > > Working Groups to co-ordinate with people (WS-I and 
 | >  | others) developing
 | >  | > > test suites.
 | >  | > >
 | >  | > > I would therefore specify that AC0012-A is delegated to 
 | >  | the Groups
 | >  | > > developing the technologies, and therefore remove the 
 | >  | mentioning of
 | >  | > > the WSAWG in AC0121-A and replace "WS-I" by something 
 | >  | more general
 | >  | > > (anybody could come up with a test suite).
 | >  | > >
 | >  | > > In the end, I would maybe drop AC0121-A and 
 | rephrase AC0012-A:
 | >  | > >
 | >  | > >   Ensures that the development of identified 
 | >  | technologies identifies
 | >  | > >   conformance so that testing software can be constructed.
 | >  | > >
 | >  | > > This is a W3C-wide goal, but I guess that it's OK 
 | to repeat it.
 | >  | >
 | >  | >--
 | >  | >Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc.
 | >  | >Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.      mbaker@planetfred.com
 | >  | >http://www.markbaker.ca   http://www.planetfred.com
 | >  | 
 | >  | --
 | >  | Jeff Mischkinsky                    jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com
 | >  | Consulting Member Technical Staff   +1(650)506-1975 (voice)
 | >  | Oracle Corporation                  +1(650)506-7225 (fax)
 | >  | 400 Oracle Parkway, M/S 4OP960
 | >  | Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
 | >  | 
 | >  | 
 | > 
 | > 
 | 
 |

Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2002 22:57:45 UTC