Re: Status of D-AG0014, coordination / liaison outside W3C

I understand Daniel's points that coordination within W3C, because of
formal structures and liaisons with between our Working Group and
other Groups, is stronger.

* Doug Bunting <db134722@iPlanet.com> [2002-03-13 11:03-0800]
> The questions seem to be:
> 1. whether "liaise" is in scope,

It is in scope to attempt to liaise on a technical level with some
relevant groups[1], which is IMO different from serving as a liaison
with the rest of the world.

> 2. whether working with outside groups is sufficiently distinct from working
> with W3C for its own WSAWG goal, and
> 3. whether such work is distinct from recognizing available technologies from
> outside groups for its own WSAWG goal.
> 
> Oh, and the minor one I raised in my mail below:
> 4. whether "other groups doing Web services related work" in the current text
> for D-AG0013 should be clarified to specifically encompass those groups not part
> of the W3C.
> 
> I lean towards "no" on all of these points but would like to hear from the rest
> of our group.  Perhaps this will only be decided on a call?

We could attempt to weaken the wording for external liaisons. I was
going to give it a try but I am having a hard time finding a wording
that I like right now.

  1. http://www.w3.org/2002/01/ws-arch-charter#external
-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ - tel:+1-617-452-2092

Received on Thursday, 14 March 2002 15:40:02 UTC