- From: Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 17:33:23 -0800
- To: Yin Leng Husband <Yin-Leng.Husband@compaq.com>
- CC: www-ws-arch@w3.org
- Message-ID: <3C8814E2.993DB498@webmethods.com>
This is good point. However I think we should recommend existing standards wherever available to avoid re-inventing. How about something on the lines: "Identify architectural and technology gaps that prevent interoperability to formulate standards-based remedies; recommending existing standards and technologies where available and formation of new working groups where none available." Regards, Prasad -------- Original Message -------- Subject: D-AG0016 - Technology Gaps Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 20:14:38 -0500 (EST) Resent-From: www-ws-arch@w3.org Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:22:11 +1000 From: Yin Leng Husband <Yin-Leng.Husband@compaq.com> To: www-ws-arch@w3.org I've taken an action item to drive DAG0016- Technology Gaps requirement discussion. The current proposed wording is "DAG0016 [The Working Group will also act to] identify current gaps in architectural interoperability and recommend standards-based remedies". As this architecture group is clearly chartered not to design the gap technologies itself, I would like to suggest changing to"identify architectural and technology gaps that prevent interoperability; and recommend formation of new working groups to formulate standards-based remedies". <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> Yin Leng
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2002 20:31:22 UTC