- From: Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 17:33:23 -0800
- To: Yin Leng Husband <Yin-Leng.Husband@compaq.com>
- CC: www-ws-arch@w3.org
- Message-ID: <3C8814E2.993DB498@webmethods.com>
This is good point. However I think we should recommend existing
standards wherever available to avoid re-inventing. How about something
on the lines:
"Identify architectural and technology gaps that prevent
interoperability to formulate standards-based remedies; recommending
existing standards and technologies where available and formation of new
working groups where none available."
Regards, Prasad
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: D-AG0016 - Technology Gaps
Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 20:14:38 -0500 (EST)
Resent-From: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:22:11 +1000
From: Yin Leng Husband <Yin-Leng.Husband@compaq.com>
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
I've taken an action item to drive DAG0016- Technology Gaps requirement
discussion.
The current proposed wording is
"DAG0016
[The Working Group will also act to] identify current gaps in
architectural interoperability and recommend standards-based remedies".
As this architecture group is clearly chartered not to design the gap
technologies itself, I would like to suggest changing to"identify
architectural and technology gaps that prevent interoperability; and
recommend formation of new working groups to formulate standards-based
remedies".
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
Yin Leng
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2002 20:31:22 UTC