- From: Vinoski, Stephen <steve.vinoski@iona.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 14:17:54 -0500
- To: "Joseph Hui" <jhui@digisle.net>
- Cc: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
No, I don't believe we have consensus that D&D needs to be in the definition. Mark summed it up perfectly in <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Feb/0191.html>. --steve > -----Original Message----- > From: Joseph Hui [mailto:jhui@digisle.net] > Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:56 PM > To: www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: RE: Web Service Definition [Was "Some Thoughts ..."] > > > By now IMHO we the WG have made the progress that D&D ought to be > in the def. (Have we not? I don't want to be presumptuous here.) > So the issue to be settled is whether D&D is already accounted for > in URI. > > In my view URI is for addressability. A globally unique ID offers > no intrinsic value to a resource's discovery. E.g. there's no way > johny, seeking to buy books, can discover a book seller by > inferring from a URI like http://www.amazon.com. > Mark's made some good points; yet I find the > "D&D-accounted-for-in-URI" > argument too tenuous. Withi the web context, D&D is an integral > (as Sandeep put it) part of WS. It's not a property that can be > assumed by default, thus calling it out is warranted. > > Cheers, > > Joe Hui > Exodus, a Cable & Wireless service > ========================================= > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org] > > Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 6:53 AM > > To: Sandeep Kumar > > Cc: Vinoski Stephen; Joseph Hui; www-ws-arch@w3.org > > Subject: Re: Web Service Definition [Was "Some Thoughts ..."] > > > > > > Sandeep, > > > > > If D&D are not an integral part of a Web Service defintion, > > > > I was claiming that discoverability *is* an integral part of the > > definition. It's just already accounted for by defining that a Web > > service be URI identifiable. > > > > I know this is a bit different than some Web service work > people have > > already done, but this is (IMO) one of those times where our > > mandate to > > be integrated with Web architecture effects our work. > > > > > pl help me define > > > how would you define a Web (or a Network) of Web Services, > > the participants. > > > > > > At a high-level, they must at least have the same > > characteristics. If not, > > > it would be much harder to reason about them > semantically, deal with > > > managing & monitoring them. > > > > Sorry, I'm unclear what you're asking. > > > > MB > > -- > > Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc. > > Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. mbaker@planetfred.com > > http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.planetfred.com > > > >
Received on Friday, 1 March 2002 14:18:28 UTC