Monday, 1 July 2002
Sunday, 30 June 2002
Saturday, 29 June 2002
Sunday, 30 June 2002
Saturday, 29 June 2002
Friday, 28 June 2002
- RE: Tool support goal
- Re: Semantics goal
- Re: Tool support goal
- Re: Late binding
- Re: Peer to Peer Goal
- Re: Late binding
- Re: D-AC004 Status
- Re: Late binding
- RE: Late binding
- Re: Late binding
- Re: Late binding
- Re: Tool support goal
- Dan Connolly's GET comment
- RE: Semantics goal
- RE: Tool support goal
Thursday, 27 June 2002
- *。。連鎖超商邀你加盟。。*
- Semantic Web presentation from Paris F2F meeting
- Re: Late binding
- RE: Late binding
- Re: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004
- RE: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004
- RE: Late binding
- Re: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004
- D-AC004 Status
- Re: Late binding
Wednesday, 26 June 2002
- RE: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004
- RE: Late binding
- Re: Late binding
- RE: Late binding
- Re: Late binding
- Re: Late binding
- RE: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004
- Re: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004
- RE: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004
- Re: Late binding
- Re: Late binding
- RE: ws-security specs
- [RTF] Meeting Notes June 25, 2002
- Tool support goal
- Re: Late binding
- Semantics goal
- Service composition
- Peer to Peer Goal
Tuesday, 25 June 2002
- RE: Addressing Orchestration
- Re: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004
- RE: Late binding
- RE: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004
- RE: Late binding
- Late binding
- RE: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004
- Re: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004
- RE: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004
- Re: Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004
- Yet another attempt to fix D-AC004
- RE: Addressing Orchestration
- Re: Addressing Orchestration
Monday, 24 June 2002
- RE: proposed AC018 rewording
- RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: What do we have now?
- RE: new version of requirements draft available
- RE: new version of requirements draft available
- Call for volunteers to gather and edit use cases
- RE: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenar i o s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usag e S cen arios document)
- RE: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenari o s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usag e S cen arios document)
- RE: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenari o s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usag e S cen arios document)
- RE: new version of requirements draft available
- new version of requirements draft available
- Re: Web services architecture document discussion (continued from F2F )
- Re: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenari o s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage S cen arios document)
- RE: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenari o s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage S cen arios document)
Saturday, 22 June 2002
- RE: D-AC007 & D-AC007.1: "Reliable" architecture
- RE: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenari o s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage S cen arios document)
Friday, 21 June 2002
- Re: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: What do we have now?
- RE:[RTF] proposed AC018 rewording
- RE: [RTF]Proposal for AC019
- RE: [RTF]Proposal for AC019
- [RTF]Proposal for AC019
- RE: D-AC007 & D-AC007.1: "Reliable" architecture
- RE: D-AC007 & D-AC007.1: "Reliable" architecture
- RE: D-AC007 & D-AC007.1: "Reliable" architecture
- RE: D-AC007 & D-AC007.1: "Reliable" architecture
- RE: D-AC007 & D-AC007.1: "Reliable" architecture
- Re: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenari o s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage S cen arios document)
- AC020.1 and AC020.3: Editorial change requested
- D-AC007 & D-AC007.1: "Reliable" architecture
- RE: proposed AC018 rewording
- RE: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenari o s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage S cen arios document)
- Re: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step?
- Re: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenario s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage Scen arios document)
- RE:S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenario s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage Scen arios document)
- RE: proposed AC018 rewording
- Re: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenarios document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenarios document)
Thursday, 20 June 2002
- Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenarios document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenarios document)
- Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenarios document
- [USTF] notes 2002-06-20 telecon
- New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenarios document
- Re: Aims and Objectives
- RE: proposed AC018 rewording
- RE: proposed AC018 rewording
- transcribed flip charts from June 2002 f2f
- RE: proposed AC018 rewording
- RE: proposed AC018 rewording
- RE: proposed AC018 rewording
- RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: What do we have now?
- Re: proposed AC018 rewording
- SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: What do we have now?
- RE: proposed AC018 rewording
- RE: proposed AC018 rewording
- RE: proposed AC018 rewording
- RE: proposed AC018 rewording
- RE: proposed AC018 rewording
- RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step?
- Re: proposed AC018 rewording
- RE: proposed AC018 rewording
- RE: proposed AC018 rewording
- RE: proposed AC018 rewording
- Re: proposed AC018 rewording
- Re: proposed AC018 rewording
- RE: proposed AC018 rewording
- RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step?
- RE: proposed AC018 rewording
- RE: proposed AC018 rewording
- RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step?
- Re: Aims and Objectives
- RE: proposed AC018 rewording
- Re: Why GET is an application semantic
- RE: Why GET is an application semantic
- RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step?
- RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step?
- Re: Why GET is an application semantic
- RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step?
- RE: Why GET is an application semantic
- RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step?
- Re: Why GET is an application semantic
Wednesday, 19 June 2002
- [RTF] Proposal on D-AC012 to WSAWG
- [RTF] Proposal on D-AC008 to WSAWG
- [RTF] Tentative Proposal on D-AG002 to WSAWG
- RE: proposed AC018 rewording
- RE: Regrets for 6/27 and 7/4 telecon
- RE: proposed AC018 rewording
- Regrets for 6/27 and 7/4 telecon
- RE: Why GET is an application semantic
- RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step?
- Re: Why GET is an application semantic
- RE: Why GET is an application semantic
- Re: Why GET is an application semantic
- proposed AC018 rewording
- RE: Why GET is an application semantic
- RE: Why GET is an application semantic
- Re: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step?
- Re: Aims and Objectives
- [RTF] Proposal on D-AC005 to WSAWG
- [RTF] Proposal on D-AC007 to WSAWG
- [USTF]EDI-like Usage Case - XMLSpec Version
- RE: Addressing Orchestration
- RE: Addressing Orchestration
- Re: Aims and Objectives
- RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step?
- RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step?
- RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step?
- Re: Why GET is an application semantic
- [RTF] Meeting Summary June 18, 2002
- RE: Why GET is an application semantic
- Addressing Orchestration
- RE: Aims and Objectives
- RE: SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step?
- RE: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services?
Tuesday, 18 June 2002
- Web services architecture document discussion (continued from F2F )
- RE: Aims and Objectives
- Aims and Objectives
- Fwd: [RTF] meeting notes for 06/18/02
- RE: [RTF] Rewording D-AG002 & D-AC007
- Re: [RTF] Rewording D-AG002 & D-AC007
- SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity: Next Step?
- [RTF] Rewording D-AG002 & D-AC007
Monday, 17 June 2002
- RE: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services?
- RE: Why GET is an application semantic
- Why GET is an application semantic
- Re: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services?
- Re: D-AC0505 through D-AC0508.....
- Re: Semantics critical success factor
- RE: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services?
- RE: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services?
- Guidelines for Writing RFC Text on Security Considerations
Sunday, 16 June 2002
Saturday, 15 June 2002
Friday, 14 June 2002
- RE: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services?
- Re: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services?
- RE: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services?
- RE: D-AC0505 through D-AC0508.....
- Re: D-AC0505 through D-AC0508.....
- Re: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services?
- Re: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services?
- Re: Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services?
- Consequences of SOAP GET to Web Services?
- Re: UML
- Re: UML
Thursday, 13 June 2002
Wednesday, 12 June 2002
Tuesday, 11 June 2002
Monday, 10 June 2002
- Travel agent use case available in XMLSpec format (was Re: [USTF] con-call minutes)
- RE: D-AR006.6 proposal
- Re: D-AC010.1 proposal
- RE: D-AR006.6 proposal
Sunday, 9 June 2002
Saturday, 8 June 2002
- RE: D-AR006.6 proposal
- RE: D-AR006.6 proposal
- Re: D-AR006.6 proposal
- Re: D-AR006.6 proposal
- Re: D-AR006.6 proposal
Friday, 7 June 2002
Thursday, 6 June 2002
- RE: [D-AC021] New internationalization requirement
- RE: [D-AC021] New internationalization requirement
- initial stab at outline of Arch doc from editors
- [USTF] con-call minutes
- Semantics critical success factor
- Use Case Definition
- RE: [D-AC021] New internationalization requirement
- RE: [D-AC021] New internationalization requirement
- Re: proposals without much pushback
- Re: [D-AC021] New internationalization requirement
- [Fwd: FW: D-AC0505 through D-AC0508.....]
- proposals without much pushback
- D-AR004.1 proposal
- D-AR006.6 proposal
- editor's drafts of documents for f2f available
- June 5th draft of requirements document
Wednesday, 5 June 2002
Tuesday, 4 June 2002
- [RTF]First Meeting Notes
- RE: [RTF]First Meeting agenda
- RE: [RTF]First Meeting agenda
- [RTF]First Meeting agenda
Saturday, 1 June 2002
Tuesday, 4 June 2002
Monday, 3 June 2002
- Re: Web Services 2.0?
- Web Services 2.0?
- RE: New top goal proposal: Management and SLA
- RE: Suggestion for AC009
- RE: New top goal proposal: Management and SLA
- RE: New top goal proposal: Management and SLA
- RE: New top goal proposal: Management and SLA
- Re: Suggestion for AC009
Sunday, 2 June 2002
- RE: New top goal proposal: Management and SLA
- [RTF] Plan of action & background
- RE: New top goal proposal: Management and SLA
- RE: Suggestion for AC009
- Re: Suggestion for AC009
- RE: D-AC010.1 proposal
- RE: D-AC010.1 proposal