- From: Damodaran, Suresh <Suresh_Damodaran@stercomm.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 17:09:10 -0500
- To: "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: "Wsa-public (E-mail)" <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
I don't think I understand your comment, Mark. Hardware is used today to implement security techniques. See [1] for a sample. I will not speak for some of the companies involved who are well represented in this WG, but I definitely think some components of Web Services will be implemented in hardware. It is not appropriate to say that WSA is a "software" architecture. Just "architecture" would suffice, IMO. Having said this, I will let the h/w company representatives to pick up this debate if they chose - this is not something I want to spend time debating. Sincerely, -Suresh Sterling Commerce [1] http://www.itglobalsecure.com/en/products/p_cat_encrypt.htm -----Original Message----- From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:59 PM To: Damodaran, Suresh Cc: Wsa-public (E-mail) Subject: Re: [RTF] Glossary entry ""metric of Architectural component" On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 02:28:56PM -0500, Damodaran, Suresh wrote: > does not seem right for WS component or WS architecture. What is > accomplished > by software can be accomplished by hardware tomorrow, may be using > living cells day-after-tomorrow! Ok, I'll take an action item to notify the editors when that happens. 8-) MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2002 18:09:34 UTC