Tuesday, 31 December 2002
- Re: Hypermedia vs. data (long)
- Re: Hypermedia vs. data (long)
- RE: Hypermedia vs. data (long)
- Re: Hypermedia vs. data (long)
- RE: Hypermedia vs. data (long)
- Re: Hypermedia vs. data (long)
- Hypermedia vs. data
Monday, 30 December 2002
Thursday, 26 December 2002
Tuesday, 24 December 2002
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- Re: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- Re: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Monday, 23 December 2002
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- Re: Hypermedia workflow
- Re: Multiparty interactions (was Re: Hypermedia workflow)
- Multiparty interactions (was Re: Hypermedia workflow)
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- Re: Hypermedia workflow
- Re: Hypermedia workflow
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Sunday, 22 December 2002
- RE: Hypermedia workflow
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Servic es)
- Re: Hypermedia workflow
- Re: Hypermedia workflow
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: Hypermedia workflow
Saturday, 21 December 2002
- Re: Hypermedia workflow
- RE: Hypermedia workflow
- RE: Hypermedia workflow
- RE: Hypermedia workflow
- RE: Hypermedia workflow
- Re: Hypermedia workflow
- RE: Hypermedia workflow
Friday, 20 December 2002
- Re: Hypermedia workflow
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Servic es)
- Re: Hypermedia workflow
- RE: Hypermedia workflow
- Hypermedia workflow
- RE: FYI: ANN: Distributed Registry for Web Services
- Re: FYI: ANN: Distributed Registry for Web Services
- FYI: ANN: Distributed Registry for Web Services
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: Web services Requirement at the client side in Orchestration
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- Re: P3P Hairball??
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- Re: initial (ROUGH!) draft of extension fwk doc
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- RE: RM and RC, our experience
Thursday, 19 December 2002
- Re: initial (ROUGH!) draft of extension fwk doc
- RE: web service and Web service
- P3P Hairball??
- [MTF] Conf Call Minutes 12/18/02
- Re: Web services Requirement at the client side in Orchestrati on
- ebXML Messaging Specification link
- RE: Web services Requirement at the client side in Orchestrati on
- web service and Web service
- RE: Web services Requirement at the client side in Orchestration
- RE: Web services Requirement at the client side in Orchestration
- Web services Requirement at the client side in Orchestration
- RE: WSA Properties (was RE: WSA constraints)
- Re: WSA Properties (was RE: WSA constraints)
- RE: WSA Properties (was RE: WSA constraints)
- Re: WSA Properties (was RE: WSA constraints)
- RE: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- Re: eBusiness Web Services (ebXML)
- RE: WSA Properties (was RE: WSA constraints)
- Re: WSA Properties (was RE: WSA constraints)
- WSA Properties (was RE: WSA constraints)
- Re: Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
- Architectural interaction
- RM and RC, our experience
- Re: WSA constraints
Wednesday, 18 December 2002
- RE: eBusiness Web Services (ebXML)
- RE: eBusiness Web Services (ebXML)
- RE: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
- Re: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
- RE: WSA constraints
- WSA constraints
- Re: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
- RE: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
- RE: Message Expiry
- Correction - RE: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
- RE: Message Expiry
- Reliability is really two-phase (was RE: Reliable Web Services)
Tuesday, 17 December 2002
- RE: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
- RE: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
- Re: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
- RE: Does RM make a qualitative difference?
- RE: Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels of Rel iable Messaging)
- Does RM make a qualitative difference?
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels of Rel iable Messaging)
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Message Expiry
- Re: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
Monday, 16 December 2002
- RE: Reliable Messaging Summary - Cont
- RE: eBusiness Web Services (ebXML)
- eBusiness Web Services (ebXML)
- Reliable Messaging Summary - Cont
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels of Rel iable Messaging)
- RE: Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels o f Rel iable Messaging)
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging - Intermediaries
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Message Expiry & the WS Architecture
- Re: Message Expiry & the WS Architecture
- RE: Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels of Rel iable Messaging)
Sunday, 15 December 2002
- Message Expiry & the WS Architecture
- RE: Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels of Rel iable Messaging)
- RE: Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels of Rel iable Messaging)
- RE: Is (sender-side) persistent storage needed for Reliable Messaging ??
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Is (sender-side) persistent storage needed for Reliable Messaging ??
- Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels of Rel iable Messaging)
- RE: Is (sender-side) persistent storage needed for Reliable Messaging ??
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Is (sender-side) persistent storage needed for Reliable Messaging ??
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging - Intermediaries
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
Saturday, 14 December 2002
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Is (sender-side) persistent storage needed for Reliable Messaging ??
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging - Intermediaries
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- Is (sender-side) persistent storage needed for Reliable Messaging ??
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging - Intermediaries
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
Friday, 13 December 2002
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: REST and document-oriented Web services
- Re: REST and document-oriented Web services
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: REST and document-oriented Web services
- REST and document-oriented Web services
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- Re: Closing issue X
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging - Intermediaries
- RE: Closing issue X
- RE: Reliable Web Services
- Re: Closing issue X
- Re: Closing issue X
- RE: Closing issue X
- RE: Closing issue X
- Re: Closing issue X
- RE: Closing issue X
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging - Intermediaries
- Re: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- Re: Closing issue X
- Re: Closing issue X
- Re: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Closing issue X
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Closing issue X
Thursday, 12 December 2002
- RE: Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- RE: Reliable Messaging reference
- Different Levels of Reliable Messaging
- Reliable Messaging reference
- RE: Reliable Web Services
- Re: Closing issue X
- RE: Closing issue X
- Closing issue X
- [MTF] Agenda for 12/18 MTF Call
- Regrets 12/12 telecon.
- RE: Reliable Web Services
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agendafor 5 December WSA telcon)
- Re: Reliable Web Services
- Possible Regrets for Thu telcon
Wednesday, 11 December 2002
Tuesday, 10 December 2002
Monday, 9 December 2002
- RE: proposed response to XMLP response to issue #390
- Re: initial (ROUGH!) draft of extension fwk doc
- proposed response to XMLP response to issue #390
- RE: RM Roles: RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?
- RE: Roles for Reliability - (was RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?)
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
Saturday, 7 December 2002
Friday, 6 December 2002
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- Re: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- Re: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- [ADMINISTRIVIA] X-Archived-At: header in the mailing lists
Thursday, 5 December 2002
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- RE: RM Roles: RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?
- RE: Roles for Reliability - (was RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?)
- Re: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- Re: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- Re: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- Re: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- Linda and the Web
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- Re: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?
- RM Roles: RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?
- Re: UDDI's UUIDs issue
- Roles for Reliability - (was RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?)
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- RE: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing?
- Re: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)
- Re: WSD Requirements: add a requirement about safe and idempotent characteristics
- Re: WSD Requirements: add a requirement about safe and idempotent characteristics
- Re: UDDI's UUIDs issue
Wednesday, 4 December 2002
- Key Quality and Protection Assertions and WDSL
- Re: WSD Requirements: add a requirement about safe and idempotent characteristics
- RE: definition of web services in "web services architecture"
- RE: UDDI's UUIDs issue
- RE: WSD Requirements: add a requirement about safe and idempotent characteristics
- Re: UDDI's UUIDs issue
- RE: definition of web services in "web services architecture"
- Re: definition of web services in "web services architecture"
- RE: UDDI's UUIDs issue
- RE: UDDI's UUIDs issue
- RE: UDDI's UUIDs issue
- Re: WSD Requirements: add a requirement about safe and idempotent characteristics
- RE: WSD Requirements: add a requirement about safe and idempotent characteristics
- RE: "Web service" or "web service"
- Re: WSD Requirements: add a requirement about safe and idempotent characteristics
- RE: WSD Requirements: add a requirement about safe and idempotent characteristics
Tuesday, 3 December 2002
- RE: WSD Requirements: add a requirement about safe and idempotent characteristics
- RE: "Web service" or "web service"
- RE: "Web service" or "web service"
- RE: WSD Requirements: add a requirement about safe and idempotent characteristics
- Re: WSD Requirements: add a requirement about safe and idempotent characteristics
- Re: WSD Requirements: add a requirement about safe and idempotent characteristics
- Multi-Party Business Transactions paper