Re: RDF and OWL "REC" documents

Sandro,

I checked it and everything looks good.

Thanks,

Ian


On February 6, Sandro Hawke writes:
> 
> 
> Would all editors please look over their docs and/or diffs and let me
> know ASAP if there's anything terribly wrong with them?  I've done
> various edits to get links to point to the right places (and in a few
> cases as requested) and it's possible I broke something in the
> process.   The cost of changes is very high, but if I broke anything,
> I do want to fix it.
> 
> RDF:
>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/
>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/diffs/20031215-20040210/
> 
> OWL:
>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/TR/
>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/diffs
>  
> Note that all the links like 
> 
>     http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/staging/$shortname
>     http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-$shortname-20030117
>     http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/TR/STAGE-$shortname
> 
> are fine; they will be rewritten to point to the frozen-in-time TR
> documents as the documents are moved.
> 
>      -- sandro

Received on Monday, 9 February 2004 11:49:10 UTC