- From: Smith, Michael K <michael.smith@eds.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:27:55 -0600
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
Sandro,
As far as I can tell, it looks fine. Thanks for all your work.
- Mike
Michael K. Smith (+1-512-404-6683)
-----Original Message-----
From: Sandro Hawke [mailto:sandro@w3.org]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 4:16 PM
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org; w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Subject: RDF and OWL "REC" documents
Would all editors please look over their docs and/or diffs and let me
know ASAP if there's anything terribly wrong with them? I've done
various edits to get links to point to the right places (and in a few
cases as requested) and it's possible I broke something in the
process. The cost of changes is very high, but if I broke anything,
I do want to fix it.
RDF:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/diffs/20031215-20040210/
OWL:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/TR/
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/diffs
Note that all the links like
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/staging/$shortname
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-$shortname-20030117
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/TR/STAGE-$shortname
are fine; they will be rewritten to point to the frozen-in-time TR
documents as the documents are moved.
-- sandro
Received on Friday, 6 February 2004 17:28:01 UTC