- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:03:17 +0300
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
I earlier reported that my code did not pass the test for cyclic structures:
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/byIssue#I5.26-006
I fixed my code today. As I was half way through fixing the code, it passed
that test and did not fail any others (well that part of the code).
A colleague argues that you should only write code to pass tests - so I wrote
a few more tests to fail before writing the half of the cycle detection fix
to my code.
These are:
I5.26-008
A cycle of unnamed individuals
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/proposedByIssue#I5.26-008
I5.5-005
Well formed list comprehension
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/proposedByIssue#I5.5-005
I5.5-006
A cylic list
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/proposedByIssue#I5.5-006
I5.5-007
A list with itself inside an element.
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/proposedByIssue#I5.5-007
The last three also investigate further the list comprehension rules.
(My code failed those tests and so I fixed it).
I imagine parsers such as Sean's and Peter's code cope with these no problem.
Jeremy
Received on Monday, 29 September 2003 12:03:32 UTC