RE: Proposed response to Hugh WInkler - allDisjoint

Will do.  But not for a few days.  

ACTION: Add text to Guide re disjoint classes and pointer to test.

- Mike

Michael K. Smith, Ph.D., P.E.
EDS - Austin Innovation Centre
98 San Jacinto, #500
Austin, TX  78701

phone: +01-512-404-6683

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Hendler [] 
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 6:35 AM
To: Jeremy Carroll;
Subject: Re: Proposed response to Hugh WInkler - allDisjoint

At 12:40 PM +0300 9/22/03, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>Mike Smith
>>  1. There is problem with the Guide text as it is.  It notes the most
>>  na´ve approach to creating disjoint classes, which is O(n^2).
>How about simply pointing to the test case. e.g.
>  "However, in the use cases we have seen, n is typically small. "
>When n is large,
>an <a href="??">example</a> in [OWL Test Cases] shows a
>possible more efficient encoding.
>The current URI for the example is:
>on approval this will become

I still think we need to actually describe the solution, not just 
point at the test -- Mike, how about putting a paragraph of 
description (take it from Ian's email or work with him to get it 
written) describing what to do - something like

"When n is large, an alternate encoding can be used.  In this case, ..."

For some reason I thought we had agreed to do this when I withdrew my 
objection to not adding allDisjoint, but I cannot find the record of 
that - so now I ask again.  Also, we should have something in Ref 
that points back to this section of Guide or has a discussion there.

Professor James Hendler
Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies	  301-405-2696
Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab.	  301-405-6707 (Fax)
Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742	  *** 240-277-3388 (Cell)      *** NOTE CHANGED CELL NUMBER ***

Received on Monday, 22 September 2003 17:47:05 UTC