- From: Deborah L. McGuinness <dlm@ksl.Stanford.EDU>
- Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 14:27:40 -0700
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Cc: Webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <3F6E17CC.6030604@ksl.stanford.edu>
ok - after susan responded, i moved to participants and am happy with a name listing. Whenever we do the next update, we might just get one person to do the updated name listing that we all should include. d Jim Hendler wrote: > At 10:36 AM -0700 9/21/03, Deborah L. McGuinness wrote: > since some of our members have not participated as far as I can tell, > i am not clear that the wording change she suggests below - > s/members of this working group/participants in this Working Group/ > > is appropriate. > This seems like an internal administrative decision that all editors > should follow > both in terms of the wording and the listing of the people. > I thought it was less disputable to state membership and then use the > listing on the site. > If we list participants then it seems like someone should figure out > who has actually participated (and that may also include people who are > not members now but have participated in the past). > I can not make that complete listing but will use it if someone makes it. > > Deborah > > > Deb - I looked where Susan directed us -- she's right. Participants > mean participants in the WG members generally means W3C members (i.e. > the organizations). So Susan is pointing out that to be consistent > w/W3C practice, we should either say "Members of this working group" > and then list the organizations (Stanford, Hewlett-Packard, Sun, etc.) > or say "Participants in this working group" and then list the > individuals. I prefer the latter. > As far as who has participated, there are many people who have come > and gone, some participating more than others, but all making some > sort of contribution in some way along the process (sometimes via > emails to chairs and team that were not shared with all members of the > WG). My instinct is to be inclusive and give everyone the benefit of > the doubt. > So my preference is to do what Susan suggests (go w/participants). > Also, we've had a few more people join - before we move to the next > stage, we should update the list to include the new members as well. > -JH > > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Comments for OWL Candidate Recommendation Resent-Date: Sun, > 21 Sep 2003 02:26:38 -0400 (EDT) Resent-From: > public-webont-comments@w3.org <mailto:public-webont-comments@w3.org> > Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 23:26:32 -0700 From: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org> > <mailto:lesch@w3.org> To: public-webont-comments@w3.org > <mailto:public-webont-comments@w3.org> > > > Hello, > > These are minor editorial comments for your OWL Candidate > Recommendation [1,2,3,4,5,6], I hope in time for your deadline. > > Overview [1] > s/publically/publicly/ > s/members of this working group/participants in this Working Group/ > s/Grahm/Graham/ > s/emposed/imposed/ > s/indivual/individual/ > s/simililarly/similarly/ > > For the References section, there is an example here: > http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#ref-section > > --- > > Guide [2] > s/intepreted/interpreted/ > s/likeliehood/likelihood/ > s/modificatons/modifications/ > s/subClsssOf/subClassOf/ > s/Workng/Working/ > s/Ontolgoy/Ontology/ > s/URI's/URIs/ > s/members of this group working group/participants in this Working Group/ > > For the References section, there is an example citation here: > http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#ref-section > > Links outside, like rdf:ID need a reference and section. There is an > example here: > http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#linking-within > > Section 7.2 most likely needs to be rewritten to point only to IANA > reserved sites per RFC 2606 (example.org, example.com and example.net > or if you need evocative names, e.g. wine-portal.example.com). The > examples and links here could be omitted. If they can't be omitted and > you can assure persistence then they can be references. If I can be of > assistance please let me know and I will help rewrite this. I am sorry > to have to say this at CR. > > A number of sites exist today that call themselves wine portals. > Google for example, provides 152,000 matches for the query "wine > portal". One of the top matches, a site called "Wine-Portal.com", > provides access to a number of sites. Many sites claiming to be > wine portals are mostly informational sites. For example, > wine-portal.com's first featured site, called 'cork cuisine' > (www.corkcuisine.com/ <http://www.corkcuisine.com/>), provides > information about matching wines > and foods, wines as gifts, etc. Another site billed as "the > Internet Wine Portal" ( www.cyberbacchus.com/ > <http://www.cyberbacchus.com/>) provides a nice > organization of a substantial amount of wine information on > numerous topics. > > Similarly, links like these should be omitted or made into citations. > wine agent > http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/webont/wineAgent/ > listing > http://www.wine.com/search/ea_results.asp?ct=1577&query=zinfandel > <http://www.wine.com/search/ea_results.asp?ct=1577&query=zinfandel> > Marietta > http://www.b-21.com/marietta/ > http://www.mariettacellars.com/welcome.html > > --- > > OWL Reference [3] is beautifully done! > s/members of this group working group/participants in this Working Group/ > > --- > > Semantics and Abstract Syntax [4] > s/discusion/discussion/ > s/particulary/particularly/ > s/vocabularly/vocabulary/ > s/members of the W3C Web Ontology Working Group/participants in the > W3C Web Ontology Working Group/ > > --- > > Test Cases [5] > s/web/Web/ > s/web-site/Web site/ > s/working group/Working Group/ > s/favourable/favorable/ > s/members of this group working group/participants in this Working Group/ > > --- > > Use Cases and Requirements [6] > s/web/Web/ > s/,,/,/ > s/members of this group working group/participants in this Working Group/ > > OntoWeb, The Open Directory Project, Agentcities, can be references if > you need to link to them. > > In the References section, the work's title should be the link. There > is an example here: http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#ref-section > > --- > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-owl-features-20030818/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-owl-guide-20030818/ > [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-owl-ref-20030818/ > [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-owl-semantics-20030818/ > [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-owl-test-20030818/ > [6] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-webont-req-20030818/ > > Best wishes for your project, > -- > Susan Lesch http://www.w3.org/People/Lesch/ > mailto:lesch@w3.org tel:+1.858.483.4819 > World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ > > >-- > > > Professor James Hendler hendler@cs.umd.edu > Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 > Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) > Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 *** 240-277-3388 (Cell) > http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler *** NOTE CHANGED CELL NUMBER *** -- Deborah L. McGuinness Associate Director Knowledge Systems Laboratory Gates Computer Science Building, 2A Room 241 Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-9020 email: dlm@ksl.stanford.edu URL: http://ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm (voice) 650 723 9770 (stanford fax) 650 725 5850 (computer fax) 801 705 0941
Received on Sunday, 21 September 2003 17:28:42 UTC