- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:48:10 +0300
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
- Cc: der@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Summary: Do systems need a fully automated test harness to pass a test? I was chatting with Dave Reynolds about what is expected to pass an entailement test. The tests are expressed as Graph1 entails Graph2 In practice many APIs (including ours) do not directly support such an operation. Hence Dave automatically transforms Graph2 into a query which he can then execute againsts Graph1, and pass the test. That looks fine to me. For some of the tests, he has a more complex query rewrite that he does manually, and then passes the test. I am discouraging him from reporting such tests as passed. (These reflect the lack of support for the comprehension axioms - the query rewrite essentially compensates for this). === What are other people doing? How much manual and/or automatic rewrite do people do? Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2003 04:48:44 UTC