- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:13:11 -0400
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "Sean Bechhofer" <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
> For each proposed test, in my view, we should do one of: > > a) approve it > b) obsolete it (no explanation needed) > c) move it to extra credit. Um, how is "extra credit" signified? It looks like part of the test name now; shouldn't it be a status, a kind of Approved? -- sandro
Received on Wednesday, 10 September 2003 14:14:27 UTC