- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 17:06:22 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: connolly@w3.org, www-webont-wg@w3.org
Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > I will be travelling to Rome this afternoon/evening/night/morning/whatever, > so my participation in the telecon is at risk. > > peter > > I was thinking of summarizing the B1 B2 state as: a) You have found a significant flaw in my purported proof. b) It is not clear yet whether this is fatal or not. c) I am willing to try and repair it, but we would need minimally one week to do the repair and a second to verify, more realistically two weeks for each stage (i.e. a month total). Does that look fair? And if the WG want us to keep trying are you happy to review a further attempt (making increased use of comprehension)? Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2003 12:53:20 UTC