- From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 16:31:49 -0400
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Cc: webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Jim Hendler wrote: > ...We have found a number of problems of various kinds, but one that > seems to come up a lot is people using owl:subclassOf, owl:range, and > owl:domain -- I'm not sure if we have a test that actually exposes > these -- might be worth creating some to make it more obvious These sorts of typos are best caught by syntactic validators i.e. XML schemas --- the problem is that there isn't one for OWL. Would it be helpful to extend the RELAXNG schema for RDF/XML to prevent "extending the OWL namespace"? or else are we happy to prevent a small subset of potentially infinite class of errors of this type. e.g. owl:rng owl:range owl:renge ... It is relatively easy specify *all* the illegal names at the XML validation level by the pattern: owl:* - (owl:Class|owl:Thing|owl:Restriction ...) Jonathan
Received on Monday, 20 October 2003 16:31:59 UTC