RE: Test Results Organisation

Along with this reorganization, we would like to propose modifying the 30 or so tests that are OWL Full instead of OWL DL simply because of the lack of declaration of classes. As I think I mentioned, if the change is made, we can classify and handle the accompanying entailment test. We discussed this last week, but seem to have come to no conclusion on that, and I also didn't see any comments on the topic in the minutes. (Actually, I think it is included in the note "Long Discussion".) I will submit the list of tests that we think should be changed before thursday.

charles

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider [mailto:pfps@research.bell-labs.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 7:20 AM
> To: Sean Bechhofer
> Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Test Results Organisation
> 
> 
> 
> From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
> Subject: Test Results Organisation
> Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 12:42:48 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)
> 
> > 
> > 
> > A while ago I raised the possibility of splitting the 
> display of test
> > results to take into account the different species levels 
> as well as the
> > approved/proposed status [1]. This would have the benefit 
> of making it
> > easier to identify whether implementations targeting a particular
> > language species were on track (and determining whether, 
> for example, an
> > implementation provides a substantial subset of DL [cf. 
> exit criterion
> > 4]).
> > 
> > I would have thought this would be relatively easy to do as the
> > information is all there in the manifests. Can I propose that we
> > make this change?
> > 
> > 	Sean
> > 
> > [1] 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Sep/0130.html
> > 
> > -- 
> > Sean Bechhofer
> > seanb@cs.man.ac.uk
> > http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb
> > 
> I think that this as an excellent idea.
> 
> peter
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:41:59 UTC