- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 10:58:36 -0500
- To: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 09:15, Sean Bechhofer wrote: [...] > In the spirit of transparency, I have added a simple test harness to our > servlet interface [1]. I've been a fan of this sort of "zero install" service for a long time... at least back to 1994 when I set up the HTML validation service. I sorta take it for granted that this is the way to do things. These days, they call it Web Services, and there's this WSDL stuff. I'm sort of embarrased to say I've never really used it. I'm curious, though, to know if WSDL can be applied to things like [1] without modification. If not, should WSDL be fixed so it can be? This isn't really WebOnt WG business, but more overall W3C coordination work. OK, I'll be honest: I'm asking the rest of you to do my homework. Any takers? > If you provide the servlet with the URI of a test > manifest, it will report on whether or not it thinks it passes the syntax > validation of the test (along with some diagnostic information as to why > it has/hasn't). > > If anyone tries this and discovers any unexpected failures (or disagrees > with the explanations), do please let me know... > > Cheers, > > Sean > > [1] http://phoebus.cs.man.ac.uk:9999/OWL/TestValidator -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2003 12:01:33 UTC