www-webont-wg@w3.org from May 2003 by date

Saturday, 31 May 2003

• Re: SEM: common class concept Jos De_Roo
• RE: making imports tests Jos De_Roo
• RE: making imports tests Jos De_Roo
• Re: Revised proposed response to: rdf:about and owl:sameIndividualAs oddities Dan Connolly
• Re: S&AS: Treatment of imports in RDF-Compatible Semantics pat hayes
• SEM: common class concept Jos De_Roo

Friday, 30 May 2003

• Re: owl:sameAs confusion (Ref and Guide) Jos De_Roo
• Revised proposed response to: rdf:about and owl:sameIndividualAs oddities pat hayes
• Re: Proposed response to: rdf:about and owl:sameIndividualAs oddities pat hayes
• Re: proposed reply for Semantics and Abstract Syntax (and some general OWL Lite, CR, & implementation) comments Jim Hendler
• Re: proposed reply for Semantics and Abstract Syntax (and some general OWL Lite, CR, & implementation) comments Dan Connolly
• proposed reply for Semantics and Abstract Syntax (and some general OWL Lite, CR, & implementation) comments Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: owl:sameAs confusion (Ref and Guide) Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposed response to: rdf:about and owl:sameIndividualAs oddities Dan Connolly
• Re: proposed reply to Re: OWL S&AS: Translation to RDF Graphs Dan Connolly
• Re: proposed reply for Re: OWL S&AS comment - owl:Ontology mapping to/from RDF triples Dan Connolly
• Proposed response to: rdf:about and owl:sameIndividualAs oddities pat hayes
• Re: potential discussion topic from Re: proposed reploy for ``OWL Abstract Syntax and Semantics review comments'' Dan Connolly
• potential discussion topic from Re: proposed reploy for ``OWL Abstract Syntax and Semantics review comments'' Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Minutes, WebOnt, 2003-05-29 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Minutes, WebOnt, 2003-05-29 ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• Re: proposed reploy for ``OWL Abstract Syntax and Semantics review comments'' Dan Connolly
• Re: Minutes, WebOnt, 2003-05-29 Sandro Hawke
• Re: Minutes, WebOnt, 2003-05-29 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Minutes, WebOnt, 2003-05-29 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• comments with different status from Jim's [was Re: WOWG: IMPORTANT - LC Comments List - Look for your name] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Proposed reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0083.html Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 1 January 1970

• Re: WOWG: IMPORTANT - LC Comments List - Look for your name Jim Hendler

Friday, 30 May 2003

• Re: WOWG: IMPORTANT - LC Comments List - Look for your name Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Minutes, WebOnt, 2003-05-29 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Agenda for telecon -- May 29 2003 Jos De_Roo
• Re: Minutes, WebOnt, 2003-05-29 Jos De_Roo

Thursday, 29 May 2003

• Re: Tests in responses to LC comments on DL design Jos De_Roo
• WOWG: IMPORTANT - LC Comments List - Look for your name Jim Hendler
• Re: separating consistency, conformance from the state of the web pat hayes
• Re: Agenda for telecon -- May 29 2003 pat hayes
• comment from Karl Dubost Jim Hendler
• Re: owl:sameAs confusion (Ref and Guide) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: owl:sameAs confusion (Ref and Guide) Jim Hendler
• Re: owl:sameAs confusion (Ref and Guide) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: owl:sameAs confusion (Ref and Guide) Jim Hendler
• Minutes, WebOnt, 2003-05-29 Sandro Hawke
• Re: owl:sameAs confusion (Ref and Guide) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• I18N review request Jeremy Carroll
• separating consistency, conformance from the state of the web Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jeff Heflin
• RE: Regrets for 5/29 telecon Marwan Sabbouh
• Regrets - Stanton Stanton, John
• RE: making imports tests Jeremy Carroll
• Regrets for 5/29 telecon Lassila Ora (NRC/Boston)
• making imports tests Dan Connolly
• regrets for may 29 telecom yasser.alsafadi@philips.com
• Tests in responses to LC comments on DL design Jim Hendler
• Re: OWL DL in RDF Jos De_Roo
• Re: OWL DL in RDF Sean Bechhofer
• Probable Regrets, 29th April Sean Bechhofer
• Re: OWL DL in RDF Jeremy Carroll
• OWL DL in RDF Sean Bechhofer
• Re: Agenda for telecon -- May 29 2003 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: WOWG: Report from WWW 2003 - OWL presentation/issues Jeremy Carroll
• Re: WOWG: Report from WWW 2003 - OWL presentation/issues Jim Hendler
• regrets -- 29 May telecon tim finin

Wednesday, 28 May 2003

• regrets: 5/29 telecon Leo Obrst
• Re: Agenda for telecon -- May 29 2003 Jos De_Roo
• RE: Agenda for telecon -- May 29 2003 Smith, Michael K
• regrets for May 29 Smith, Michael K
• Re: WOWG: Report from WWW 2003 - OWL presentation/issues Dan Connolly
• Re: WOWG: Report from WWW 2003 - OWL presentation/issues Ian Horrocks
• Re: What OWL doesn't do (LC response editing) Dan Connolly
• Re: presentation syntax publication details: abstract, namespace name Jonathan Borden
• What OWL doesn't do (LC response editing) Jim Hendler
• Re: owl:sameAs confusion (Ref and Guide) Guus Schreiber
• Re: owl:sameAs confusion (Ref and Guide) Guus Schreiber
• presentation syntax publication details: abstract, namespace name Dan Connolly
• Proposed response regarding imports issue Jeff Heflin
• owl:sameAs confusion (Ref and Guide) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Agenda for telecon -- May 29 2003 Mike Dean
• Agenda for telecon -- May 29 2003 Jim Hendler
• Reasoning and inference are the same, or different. Peng Jian Xiang

Tuesday, 27 May 2003

• Re: Minutes of the beer session Jim Hendler
• Re: Minutes of the beer session Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Minutes of the beer session Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• TEST all changes included, ready to ship Jeremy Carroll
• Minutes - WebOnt Telecon May 22, 2003 Jean-François BAGET
• versionInfo and issue list Jeremy Carroll
• Re: imports issue Jeremy Carroll

Monday, 26 May 2003

• Re: imports issue Jim Hendler
• Re: datatyping in test for Pat's review Ian Horrocks
• Re: TEST Ian Horrocks
• Re: Minutes of the beer session Jim Hendler
• Re: datatyping in test for Pat's review Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TEST Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jeremy Carroll
• Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC? Jeremy Carroll
• Minutes of the beer session Jeremy Carroll
• Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC? Jos De_Roo
• Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: imports issue Jeremy Carroll
• Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC? Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Sunday, 25 May 2003

• Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC? Jos De_Roo
• Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC? Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Saturday, 24 May 2003

• Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC? Jos De_Roo
• Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC? Jos De_Roo
• WOWG: Report from WWW 2003 - OWL presentation/issues Jim Hendler
• TEST Ian Horrocks
• Re: datatyping in test for Pat's review Ian Horrocks
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Ian Horrocks

Thursday, 22 May 2003

• RE: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Massimo Marchiori
• regrets for 22 May yasser.alsafadi@philips.com
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jeff Heflin
• Re: datatyping in test for Pat's review Jeremy Carroll
• Regrets - Stanton Stanton, John
• Re: S&AS: Treatment of imports in RDF-Compatible Semantics Jeff Heflin
• Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC? Jim Hendler
• regrets may 22, 29, june 5, 12 Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: S&AS: Treatment of imports in RDF-Compatible Semantics Jim Hendler
• RE: Regrets (May 22) Charles White
• Re: S&AS: Treatment of imports in RDF-Compatible Semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: S&AS: Treatment of imports in RDF-Compatible Semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: WOWG: agenda May 22 telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jim Hendler
• Regrets, May 22 Sean Bechhofer
• Regrets (May 22) Ian Horrocks
• Re: Regrets, May 22 Nick Gibbins
• Re: WOWG: agenda May 22 telecon Mike Dean

Wednesday, 21 May 2003

• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jeff Heflin
• Re: WOWG: agenda May 22 telecon Jeremy Carroll
• Re: WOWG: agenda May 22 telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Regrets, May 22 Sandro Hawke
• WOWG: agenda May 22 telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: S&AS: Treatment of imports in RDF-Compatible Semantics Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Annotations in Abstract Syntax Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 20 May 2003

• regrets telecon 22 may herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Fwd: Missing references for OWL issue 5.6 daml:imports Jim Hendler
• Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jim Hendler
• Re: Annotations in Abstract Syntax Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Monday, 19 May 2003

• S&AS: Treatment of imports in RDF-Compatible Semantics Jeff Heflin
• Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue Jeff Heflin
• RDF Core decision on LC issue timbl-03 Dave Beckett
• Re: effects of changes to RDF datatyping pat hayes
• Annotations in Abstract Syntax Sean Bechhofer
• Re: Test Cases: Extended Cardinality Testing Thorsten Liebig

Saturday, 17 May 2003

• Re: datatyping in test for Pat's review pat hayes

Friday, 16 May 2003

• Re: move oneOf - should issue be opened? (was Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP) Jos De_Roo
• Re: effects of changes to RDF datatyping Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Test Cases: Extended Cardinality Testing Jeremy Carroll
• Re: WOWG: contentive comment summary Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Test Cases: Extended Cardinality Testing Thorsten Liebig
• Re: effects of changes to RDF datatyping Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: effects of changes to RDF datatyping Jeremy Carroll
• WebOnt response to your issue timbl-03 Jim Hendler
• Re: effects of changes to RDF datatyping Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: effects of changes to RDF datatyping Jim Hendler
• XMLLiteral examples for I18N Jeremy Carroll
• datatyping in test Jeremy Carroll
• test count Jeremy Carroll
• Re: effects of changes to RDF datatyping Jeremy Carroll
• Re: effects of changes to RDF datatyping Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 15 May 2003

• WOWG: contentive comment summary Jim Hendler
• Re: effects of changes to RDF datatyping Jos De_Roo
• Re: comments on OWL test cases Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Ian Horrocks
• effects of changes to RDF datatyping Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• REGRETS: Agenda/Logistics - Telecon May 15, 2003 Thompson, Lynne R
• Re: MnM tool for semantic markup available for download Jim Hendler
• belated regrets, 5/15 telecon Leo Obrst
• Re: comments on OWL test cases (chuckle) Dan Connolly
• Minutes - WebOnt Telecon May 15, 2003 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: nominals and cardinalities Ian Horrocks
• MnM tool for semantic markup available for download Enrico Motta
• RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Smith, Michael K
• RE: Regrets: Telecon May 22 2003 Marwan Sabbouh
• regrets May 22 telecon ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• Regrets: Telecon May 22 2003 Smith, Michael K
• Re: comments on OWL test cases pat hayes
• RE: Agenda/Logistics - Telecon May 15, 2003 Marwan Sabbouh
• Re: complete and terminating Ian Horrocks
• RE: Datatypes Smith, Michael K
• Re: comments on OWL test cases Ian Horrocks
• Re: comments on OWL test cases Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• complete and terminating Jeremy Carroll
• Re: comments on OWL test cases Jeremy Carroll
• Re: proposed reply to Re: OWL S&AS: Translation to RDF Graphs Jeff Heflin
• Re: comments on OWL test cases Ian Horrocks
• Re: move oneOf - should issue be opened? (was Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP) Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Agenda request: Test LC vote Charles White
• Regrets: Telecon May 15, 2003 Jerome Euzenat
• Re: Agenda/Logistics - Telecon May 15, 2003 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: approve test cases Jim Hendler
• approve test cases Jeremy Carroll
• Agenda/Logistics - Telecon May 15, 2003 Jim Hendler
• Test index added Jeremy Carroll
• Re: comments on OWL test cases Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TEST: last call candidate Sean Bechhofer

Wednesday, 14 May 2003

• Re: owl:All(something) ?? Jos De_Roo
• Re: comments on OWL test cases Ian Horrocks
• Re: move oneOf - should issue be opened? (was Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP) Jos De_Roo
• Comment on TEST Ian Horrocks
• TEST updated document Jeremy Carroll
• Re: owl:All(something) ?? Ian Horrocks
• Re: nominals (was RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP) Ian Horrocks
• Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC? Dan Connolly
• regrets May 15 pat hayes
• Re: proposed reply to Re: OWL S&AS: Translation to RDF Graphs Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TEST: last call candidate Ian Horrocks
• Re: proposed reply to Re: OWL S&AS: Translation to RDF Graphs Jim Hendler
• move oneOf - should issue be opened? (was Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP) Jim Hendler
• Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC? Jim Hendler
• Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TEST: last call candidate Jim Hendler
• Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Ian Horrocks
• Re: nominals (was RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP) Ian Horrocks
• Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Ian Horrocks
• Re: comments on OWL test cases Ian Horrocks
• Re: proposed partial reply for [Re: Remarks on OWL Guide and question about AS&S] Ian Horrocks
• Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Ian Horrocks
• Re: TEST: last call candidate Jeremy Carroll
• regrets for 5-15-2003 phone call yasser.alsafadi@philips.com
• Re: TEST: last call candidate Jeremy Carroll
• Re: owl:All(something) ?? Jos De_Roo
• Re: owl:All(something) ?? Jos De_Roo
• ontology names (was Re: Minutes from webont telecon of 8 May) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposed reply for Re: OWL S&AS comment - owl:Ontology mapping to/from RDF triples Jim Hendler
• Re: TEST: last call candidate Sandro Hawke
• Re: owl:All(something) ?? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposed reply for Re: OWL S&AS comment - owl:Ontology mapping to/from RDF triples Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: owl:All(something) ?? Jim Hendler
• proposed reply to Re: OWL S&AS: Translation to RDF Graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: owl:All(something) ?? Jos De_Roo
• Re: proposed reply for Re: OWL S&AS comment - owl:Ontology mapping to/from RDF triples Dan Connolly
• Re: proposed reply for Re: OWL S&AS comment - owl:Ontology mapping to/from RDF triples Jim Hendler
• proposed reply for Re: OWL S&AS comment - owl:Ontology mapping to/from RDF triples Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: owl:All(something) ?? Jim Hendler
• [Fwd: comments on OWL Last Call drafts] Dan Connolly
• raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC? Jim Hendler
• Re: Agenda request: Test LC vote Dan Connolly
• Re: TEST: last call candidate Jim Hendler
• Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Guus Schreiber
• proposed partial reply for [Re: Remarks on OWL Guide and question about AS&S] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Agenda for this week (late again) Jim Hendler
• Re: closing threads in public-webont-comments Jim Hendler
• closing threads in public-webont-comments Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Jim Hendler
• Agenda request: Test LC vote Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 13 May 2003

• probable regrets for thurs due to travel Deborah McGuinness
• Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Jos De_Roo
• Re: Datatypes in test (attn Ian, Pat, Sandro) RE: comments on OWL test cases Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Datatypes Jeremy Carroll
• Re: SEM: OWL Full semantics Dan Connolly
• Re: SEM: OWL Full semantics pat hayes
• Re: comments on OWL test cases Jeremy Carroll
• Re: comments on OWL test cases Jeremy Carroll
• Re: SEM: OWL Full semantics Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Further broken link in S&AS Dan Connolly
• Re: SEM: OWL Full semantics Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP (move owl:oneOf, owl: have Value to OWL Full) Dan Connolly
• Further broken link in S&AS Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposed response to "imports error in App. B of OWL Language Reference 31 March 2003" Dan Connolly
• nominals and cardinalities Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Jim Hendler
• Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Jim Hendler
• Re: proposed reploy for ``OWL Abstract Syntax and Semantics review comments'' Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Dan Connolly
• Re: nominals (was RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP) Dan Connolly
• SHOULD NOT return unknown Jeremy Carroll
• Datatypes in test (attn Ian, Pat, Sandro) RE: comments on OWL test cases Jeremy Carroll
• Re: SEM: OWL Full semantics pat hayes

Monday, 12 May 2003

• comments on OWL test cases pat hayes
• Re: SEM: OWL Full semantics Jos De_Roo
• Re: More tests verified Jeremy Carroll
• Re: nominals (was RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TEST: last call candidate (?) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: SEM: OWL Full semantics pat hayes
• More tests verified Ian Horrocks
• nominals (was RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP) Jim Hendler
• Re: TEST: last call candidate (?) Jeff Heflin
• RE: complete checkers should or MUST pass tests Jeremy Carroll
• Re: owl:All(something) ?? Deborah L. McGuinness
• RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Ian Horrocks
• RE: Jena comment: Syntax Checker Implementation Report] Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Jena comment: Syntax Checker Implementation Report] Jim Hendler
• Re: owl:All(something) ?? Jim Hendler
• RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Jeremy Carroll
• RE: owl:All(something) ?? Jeremy Carroll
• RE: SAT tests in TEST doc Jeremy Carroll
• Re: owl:All(something) ?? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Ian Horrocks
• SAT tests in TEST doc Ian Horrocks
• RE: complete checkers should or MUST pass tests Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposed response to "imports error in App. B of OWL Language Reference 31 March 2003" Guus Schreiber
• Re: complete checkers should or MUST pass tests Sandro Hawke
• Jena comment: Syntax Checker Implementation Report] Jeremy Carroll
• Re: owl:All(something) ?? Ian Horrocks
• complete checkers should or MUST pass tests Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TEST review copy Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TEST: last call candidate (?) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Testing Test Jeremy Carroll
• Re: owl:All(something) ?? Jeremy Carroll
• owl:All(something) ?? Jim Hendler

Sunday, 11 May 2003

• Re: bug in semantics (was Re: intersectionOf and subClassOf) Jeremy Carroll
• Proposed response to "imports error in App. B of OWL Language Reference 31 March 2003" Mike Dean
• Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Ian Horrocks
• Fwd: comments on wording in AS&S Jim Hendler
• RE: Comments on OWL from XML Schema WG Jim Hendler
• Re: proposed reploy for ``OWL Abstract Syntax and Semantics review comments'' Jim Hendler

Saturday, 10 May 2003

• Testing Test Ian Horrocks
• Re: rdf:about and owl:sameIndividualAs oddities Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• SEM: OWL Full semantics Jos De_Roo

Friday, 9 May 2003

• Re: proposed interim response for ``Comments from RDFCore on S+AS'' Dan Brickley
• Re: TEST review copy Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Comments on OWL from XML Schema WG Biron,Paul V
• Re: S&AS comments Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Minutes from webont telecon of 8 May ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• Re: TEST review copy Sandro Hawke
• Re: Comments on OWL from XML Schema WG Jim Hendler
• Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP Jim Hendler
• bug in semantics (was Re: intersectionOf and subClassOf) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Comments on OWL from XML Schema WG Biron,Paul V
• Re: CR/PR questions Jim Hendler
• Re: bug in semantics (was Re: intersectionOf and subClassOf) Jeremy Carroll
• proposed reploy for ``OWL Abstract Syntax and Semantics review comments'' Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• consistency in mapping of properties Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• proposed interim response for ``Comments from RDFCore on S+AS'' Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• CFP: Workshop on PRACTICAL AND SCALABLE SEMANTIC SYSTEMS Raphael Volz
• TEST: various completed actions (imports, datatypeproperties, subj pred class, ...) Jeremy Carroll
• Further wine.owl suggestions Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TEST: last call candidate (?) Sean Bechhofer
• Re: TEST: description-logic testcases Jos De_Roo
• TEST: description-logic testcases Jos De_Roo

Thursday, 8 May 2003

• RE: GUIDE: wine.owl Smith, Michael K
• Re: TEST: last call candidate (?) Jeff Heflin
• Re: Inverse roles Ian Horrocks
• REGRETS: WOWG: agenda May 8 telecon Thompson, Lynne R
• Re: CR/PR questions Ian Horrocks
• RE: GUIDE: wine.owl Charles White
• Regrets, 8/5/03 Sean Bechhofer
• Minor comments about the Overview document Lassila Ora (NRC/Boston)
• introduction Sandro Hawke
• RE: Probable regrets: 5/8 telecon Marwan Sabbouh
• Regrets for 2003-05-08 telecon Nick Gibbins
• Re: WOWG: agenda May 8 telecon Jeremy Carroll
• Re: datatypes decision not carried out in specs?!? Guus Schreiber
• Re: bug in InverseFunctionalProperty definition? Guus Schreiber
• Proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0027.html Guus Schreiber
• Re: Issue 3.2 QCR: proposal to POSTPONE Jonathan Borden
• WOWG: agenda May 8 telecon Guus Schreiber

Wednesday, 7 May 2003

• regrets: 5/8 telecon Leo Obrst
• Re: Comment on non-global keys Ian Horrocks
• Re: TEST: last call candidate (?) (4.2.2 nit) Dan Connolly
• Re: WOWG: Need to know about your implementations -- ASAP Tim Finin
• Re: TEST: last call candidate (?) Dan Connolly
• Re: Fwd: Re: Comment on non-global keys ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• Re: TEST I5.24 - 004 was RE: Partial? regrets May 1st Ian Horrocks
• TEST: last call candidate (?) Jeremy Carroll
• bug in InverseFunctionalProperty definition? Tim Finin
• Fwd: Re: Comment on non-global keys Jim Hendler
• Re: WOWG: Need to know about your implementations -- ASAP Sean Bechhofer
• RE: Guide Comments: Suggested response w/ question Smith, Michael K
• Re: Comment on non-global keys Jim Hendler
• AGENDA a few hours late Guus Schreiber
• Issue 3.2 QCR: proposal to POSTPONE Guus Schreiber
• Re: [Fwd: Re: [Jena-devel] RE: WOWG: Need to know about your implementations -- ASAP] Jim Hendler
• Re: Comment on non-global keys Guus Schreiber
• More Testing Ian Horrocks
• [Fwd: Re: [Jena-devel] RE: WOWG: Need to know about your implementations -- ASAP] Dave Reynolds
• Re: TEST I5.24 - 004 was RE: Partial? regrets May 1st Sean Bechhofer
• TEST status Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Comment on non-global keys Ian Horrocks
• Comment on non-global keys Jim Hendler

Tuesday, 6 May 2003

• Re: TEST I5.24 - 004 was RE: Partial? regrets May 1st Jos De_Roo
• Re: TEST I5.24 - 004 was RE: Partial? regrets May 1st Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TEST I5.24 - 004 was RE: Partial? regrets May 1st Ian Horrocks
• RE: Privacy comment on public-comments Smith, Michael K
• Privacy comment on public-comments Jim Hendler
• Inverse roles Sean Bechhofer
• RE: WOWG: Need to know about your implementations -- ASAP Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Issues List updated Smith, Michael K
• RE: rdf:List RE: timbl-03 Jeremy Carroll
• WOWG: Need to know about your implementations -- ASAP Jim Hendler
• RE: GUIDE: wine.owl XSD bug Smith, Michael K
• TEST I5.24 - 004 was RE: Partial? regrets May 1st Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Partial? regrets May 1st Sean Bechhofer
• Re: rdf:List RE: timbl-03 Jim Hendler
• GUIDE: wine.owl XSD bug Jeremy Carroll
• rdf:List RE: timbl-03 Jeremy Carroll
• proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0008.html Mike Dean

Monday, 5 May 2003

• Re: changes to S&AS (including a completed action item) Mike Dean
• Re: Issues List updated Dan Connolly
• Issues List updated Smith, Michael K
• Re: CR/PR questions Jos De_Roo
• RE: Guide: Proposed response to comments. Smith, Michael K
• Re: CR/PR questions Jeremy Carroll
• Guide Comments: Proposed response. Smith, Michael K
• Re: CR/PR questions Jim Hendler
• Re: CR/PR questions Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Guide: Proposed response to comments. Jim Hendler
• Re: CR/PR questions Jeremy Carroll
• TEST: extra-credit/Manifest002 Jos De_Roo
• Guide: Proposed response to comments. Smith, Michael K
• Re: CR/PR questions Jim Hendler
• RE: rdf:List Jeremy Carroll
• changes to S&AS (including a completed action item) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Moving owl:Nothing from DL to Lite Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: rdf:List Dan Connolly
• Re: rdf:List Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposed reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0029.html Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Sunday, 4 May 2003

• Re: CR/PR questions Jeremy Carroll
• Re: rdf:List Jos De_Roo
• CR/PR questions Jim Hendler

Friday, 2 May 2003

• rdf:List Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Minutes telcon May 1, 2003 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Guide Comments: Suggested response w/ question Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Guide Comments: Suggested response w/ question Jeremy Carroll
• RE: QCR banquets Jeremy Carroll
• QCR banquets Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 1 May 2003

• Minutes telcon May 1, 2003 Dan Connolly
• RE: telcon index updated; update issues list? Smith, Michael K
• approved testcases Jos De_Roo
• Re: datatypes decision not carried out in specs?!? Ian Horrocks
• Belated Regrets 5/1 Telecom Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: datatypes decision not carried out in specs?!? Smith, Michael K
• Re: QCRs - How much time are they worth? Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: Moving owl:Nothing from DL to Lite Deborah L. McGuinness
• regrets for may 8 webont telecon Deborah L. McGuinness
• Guide Comments: Suggested response w/ question Smith, Michael K
• Regrets for 2003-05-01 telecon Nick Gibbins
• AGENDA and LOGISTICS, telecon of May 1, 2003 Jim Hendler
• datatypes decision not carried out in specs?!? Dan Connolly
• telcon index updated; update issues list? Dan Connolly
• Regrets 5/1 Telecom - Stanton Stanton, John
• probable regrets: 5/1 telecon Marwan Sabbouh
• regrets: 5/1 telecon Leo Obrst
• regrets: 5/1 telecon Leo Obrst

Last message date: Saturday, 31 May 2003 08:04:10 UTC