www-webont-wg@w3.org from July 2003 by date

Thursday, 31 July 2003

RE: review of wine.owl and food.owl Smith, Michael K
belated regrets: telecon 7/31 Leo Obrst
RE: review of wine.owl and food.owl Smith, Michael K
Overview document now contains references section Deborah L. McGuinness
regrets, maybe. pat hayes
CR request is submitted Jim Hendler

Wednesday, 30 July 2003

RE: review of wine.owl and food.owl Smith, Michael K
Re: sameIndividualAs Deborah McGuinness
RE: sameIndividualAs Smith, Michael K
Re: Overview doesn't cite use cases and requirements Deborah L. McGuinness
RE: sameIndividualAs Charles White
Re: sameIndividualAs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: sameIndividualAs Dan Connolly
sameIndividualAs Charles White
Re: Overview doesn't cite use cases and requirements Dan Connolly
regrets for two telecons herman.ter.horst@philips.com
Re: Overview doesn't cite use cases and requirements ewallace@cme.nist.gov
Overview doesn't cite use cases and requirements Dan Connolly
Re: pls elaborate citations in OWL Overview Dan Connolly

Monday, 28 July 2003

RE: Deborah L. McGuiness in Guide? Smith, Michael K
Re: Proposed response to Dave Reynolds on dataranges Dan Connolly
Re: Proposed response to Dave Reynolds on dataranges Jeremy Carroll
Re: Proposed response to Dave Reynolds on dataranges Dan Connolly
TEST: sameAs I4.6-001 and I4.6-002 obsoleted Jeremy Carroll

Sunday, 27 July 2003

Re: Proposed response to Dave Reynolds on dataranges Jim Hendler
Re: Proposed response to Dave Reynolds on dataranges Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Proposed response to Dave Reynolds on dataranges Ian Horrocks

Saturday, 26 July 2003

Re: Tests illustrating structure sharing Jeremy Carroll

Friday, 25 July 2003

Re: Tests illustrating structure sharing Jos De_Roo
Re: Tests illustrating structure sharing Jim Hendler
Tests illustrating structure sharing Jeremy Carroll
Re: review of wine.owl and food.owl (attn Sandro, Dan, Jos) Jos De_Roo
Re: review of wine.owl and food.owl Jeremy Carroll
Re: review of wine.owl and food.owl (attn Sandro, Dan, Jos) Jeremy Carroll
draft minutes from July 24 telecon ewallace@cme.nist.gov
Re: review of wine.owl and food.owl Jeremy Carroll
RE: Test ontologies Jim Hendler
Re: Deborah L. McGuiness in Guide? Deborah McGuinness
Re: review of S&AS and 5.3 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: Test ontologies Ian Horrocks
RE: Test ontologies Jim Hendler
review of wine.owl and food.owl Jeremy Carroll
RE: Test ontologies + forgotten attachment Ian Horrocks
RE: Test ontologies Ian Horrocks
RE: Test ontologies Peter Crowther
Test ontologies Ian Horrocks
Withdrawing HP's objection to OWL DL Syntax Jeremy Carroll
Humo(u)r -- OWL Acronyms Jim Hendler

Thursday, 24 July 2003

Re: thanks to all Jos De_Roo
thanks to all Jim Hendler
Minutes fix Jim Hendler
review of S&AS and 5.3 Jeremy Carroll
Re: Dave Reynold's message - bNodes as object in multiple triples Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: TEST: 7 of 7: unionOf and the Patel-Schneider paradox Jeremy Carroll
Re: no explicit type on bnodes Jeremy Carroll
Re: TEST: 6 of 7: empty universe example, Jeremy Carroll
IMPORTANT Agenda Amendments Sandro Hawke
regrets today pat hayes
mitre votes for moving to CR Marwan Sabbouh
Re: TEST: 6 of 7: empty universe example, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: no explicit type on bnodes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: ADMIN: VOTING DETAILS FOR CR DECISION Bernard Vatant
Re: ADMIN: VOTING DETAILS FOR CR DECISION Jeff Heflin
Re: ADMIN: VOTING DETAILS FOR CR DECISION [Proxy] Masahiro Hori
Re: TEST: 6 of 7: empty universe example, Jim Hendler
Re: Proposed Test: oneof/inverse Jeremy Carroll
Potential Regrets for Today's Telecon Jeff Heflin
Re: TEST: 5 of 7: was Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint Jeremy Carroll
Re: TEST: 1 of 7 : document updated - intro Jeremy Carroll
I vote for moving to CR (was: RE: ADMIN: VOTING DETAILS FOR CR DECISION) Ora Lassila
Re: TEST: 2 of 7 : issue 5.3 Jeremy Carroll
Re: TEST: 6 of 7: empty universe example, Jeremy Carroll
Re: TEST: 6 of 7: empty universe example, Mehrdad Omidvari
Outstanding comments Ian Horrocks
Re: TEST: 5 of 7: was Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint Ian Horrocks
RE: Modeling issues and guidelines? Bernard Vatant
Re: TEST: 2 of 7 : issue 5.3 Ian Horrocks
Re: TEST: 1 of 7 : document updated - intro Ian Horrocks
Re: Modeling issues and guidelines? Ian Horrocks
Re: Proposal to request Candidate Recommendation Dan Connolly
Re: specifying minimal datatypes without reference to "OWL Tools" Dan Connolly
Re: Proposal to request Candidate Recommendation Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: specifying minimal datatypes without reference to "OWL Tools" Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: TEST: 6 of 7: empty universe example, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: new version of S&AS in response to changes to RDF model theory Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 23 July 2003

IMPORTANT - ADMIN: DETAILS FOR JULY 23 TELECON (and my regrets) Jim Hendler
Re: Modeling issues and guidelines? Dan Connolly
Re: TEST: 6 of 7: empty universe example, Jos De_Roo
ADMIN: VOTING DETAILS FOR CR DECISION Jim Hendler
Re: specifying minimal datatypes without reference to "OWL Tools" Dan Connolly
Re: issues with respect to the test cases overall manifest document Jeremy Carroll
Re: new version of S&AS in response to changes to RDF model theory Dan Connolly
Re: issues with respect to the test cases overall manifest document Jim Hendler
Re: TEST: 2 of 7 : issue 5.3 Dan Connolly
Regrets August 7 Jeremy Carroll
Dave Reynold's comment - dataranges Jeremy Carroll
Dave Reynold's message - bNodes as object in multiple triples Jeremy Carroll
Re: your request to reopen 5.26 (was Re: Minutes of the beer session) Jeremy Carroll
Re: your request to reopen 5.26 Jim Hendler
Re: issues with respect to the test cases overall manifest document Jeremy Carroll
possible regrets, Re: Proposal to request Candidate Recommendation Jonathan Borden
Re: Proposal to request Candidate Recommendation Jim Hendler
[moved] Re: Proposal to request Candidate Recommendation Jim Hendler
Re: Proposal to request Candidate Recommendation Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: TEST: 5 of 7: was Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint Jim Hendler
Re: TEST: 7 of 7: unionOf and the Patel-Schneider paradox Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: TEST: 6 of 7: empty universe example, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: TEST: 4 of 7: was: Need a test -- inverse and oneOf Jim Hendler
Re: issues with respect to the test cases overall manifest document Jim Hendler
Re: your request to reopen 5.26 (was Re: Minutes of the beer session) Jos De_Roo
my review of the July 15 draft of RDF Semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Agenda and Logistics July 24 telecon -- CR vote expected Jim Hendler
optional list typing (was Re: Proposal to request Candidate Recommendation) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
new version of S&AS in response to changes to RDF model theory Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Agenda and Logistics July 24 telecon -- CR vote expected Jim Hendler
Re: Proposal to request Candidate Recommendation Jeremy Carroll
TEST: 7 of 7: unionOf and the Patel-Schneider paradox Jeremy Carroll
TEST: 6 of 7: empty universe example, Jeremy Carroll
TEST: 5 of 7: was Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint Jeremy Carroll
TEST: 4 of 7: was: Need a test -- inverse and oneOf Jeremy Carroll
TEST: 3 of 7 : RDFS changed semantics of rdfs:subClassOf Jeremy Carroll
TEST: 2 of 7 : issue 5.3 Jeremy Carroll
TEST: 1 of 7 : document updated - intro Jeremy Carroll
Re: Unanswered comment? Jim Hendler
Re: Proposal to request Candidate Recommendation Jim Hendler
your request to reopen 5.26 (was Re: Minutes of the beer session) Jim Hendler
Re: RDFCore Comments on OWL Reference Jim Hendler
Re: RDFCore Comments on OWL Reference Jeremy Carroll
Re: Unanswered comment? Jeremy Carroll
Re: issues with respect to the test cases overall manifest document Jeremy Carroll
[Fwd: Question on OWL Lite] Jeremy Carroll
Re: Agenda and Logistics July 24 telecon -- CR vote expected Jeremy Carroll
Re: Agenda and Logistics July 24 telecon -- CR vote expected Jeremy Carroll
Unanswered comment? Jeremy Carroll
Re: Proposal to request Candidate Recommendation Jeremy Carroll
Re: Minutes of the beer session Jeremy Carroll
Agenda and Logistics July 24 telecon -- CR vote expected Jim Hendler

Tuesday, 22 July 2003

Proposal to request Candidate Recommendation Jim Hendler
WOWG - New version of CR request Jim Hendler
Re: Minutes of the beer session Jim Hendler
Re: PR/CR Page Jos De_Roo
Re: Minutes of the beer session Jeremy Carroll
RE: issue list sick? Dan Connolly
RE: issue list sick? Smith, Michael K
Re: Proposed response to Ken Laskey Jeff Heflin
owl:Thing and owl:Nothing Jeremy Carroll
modified action Jeremy Carroll
Deborah L. McGuiness in Guide? Jeremy Carroll
issue list sick? Jeremy Carroll
RE: Proposed response to Dave Reynolds - questions from HP Jim Hendler
Modeling issues and guidelines? Bernard Vatant
Re: "ObjectProperty" and "DatatypeProperty" Ian Horrocks
RE: Proposed response to Dave Reynolds - questions from HP Jeremy Carroll
RE: Proposed response to Dave Reynolds - questions from HP Jeremy Carroll

Monday, 21 July 2003

Re: PR/CR Page Jim Hendler
PR/CR Page Charles White
All messages answered Jim Hendler
Re: Proposed response to Dave Reynolds - questions from HP Ian Horrocks
Re: Proposed response to Dave Reynolds - questions from HP Dan Connolly
Re: Proposed response to Dave Reynolds - questions from HP Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Proposed response to Dave Reynolds - questions from HP Jim Hendler
Proposed response to Dave Reynolds - questions from HP Jim Hendler
Re: helping folks read the OWL schema Jonathan Borden
RE: helping folks read the OWL schema Jeremy Carroll

Sunday, 20 July 2003

TEST: update of testresults Jos De_Roo

Friday, 18 July 2003

Re: WOWG: We need your results on the Tests Ian Horrocks
Re: New WG member - introduction Jim Hendler
New WG member - introduction Bernard Vatant
Re: Proposed response to Ken Laskey Jim Hendler
helping folks read the OWL schema Dan Connolly
Re: Proposed response to Ken Laskey ewallace@cme.nist.gov
Re: Proposed response to Ken Laskey Jim Hendler
Re: Proposed response to Ken Laskey Jeff Heflin
Re: Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG Jeff Heflin
Re: More OWL test passers Jos De_Roo
WOWG: Move to CR/PR - heads up and press release? Jim Hendler

Thursday, 17 July 2003

Proposed response to Ken Laskey Jim Hendler
Answering Ken Laskey (incl. proposal w/respect to AllDisjoint) Jim Hendler
Re: WOWG: minutes Jul 10 telecon Jim Hendler
Re: Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG Jim Hendler
Re: Proposed response to Gary Ng http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jul/0014.ht ml Jim Hendler
Re: More OWL test passers Dan Connolly
Re: WOWG: We need your results on the Tests Dan Connolly
Proposed response to Gary Ng http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jul/0014.html Jeremy Carroll
belated regrets: telecon of 7/17/03 Leo Obrst
Re: Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG ewallace@cme.nist.gov
Re: WOWG: minutes Jul 10 telecon Dan Connolly
Re: WOWG: minutes Jul 10 telecon Jeremy Carroll
More OWL test passers Jim Hendler
Regrets July 24 and August 7th teklecom Jerome Euzenat
Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint (was Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG) Ian Horrocks
Re: WOWG: We need your results on the Tests Ian Horrocks
Re: examples entailment questions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: WOWG: We need your results on the Tests Jos De_Roo

Wednesday, 16 July 2003

Re: new reply to comments by Bijan Parsia Jim Hendler
Re: new reply to comments by Bijan Parsia Jeremy Carroll
Re: new reply to comments by Bijan Parsia Dan Connolly
new reply to comments by Bijan Parsia Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: examples entailment questions Ian Horrocks
Re: Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG Jim Hendler
Re: Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG Jeff Heflin
Re: Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG Jeff Heflin
Update of spread sheet Jim Hendler
A couple more comments Jim Hendler
ADMIN: Status of Comments - 7/15 Jim Hendler
Re: WOWG: We need your results on the Tests Jos De_Roo

Tuesday, 15 July 2003

ADMIN; REMINDER - NO TELECON THIS WEEK Jim Hendler
Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint (was Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG) Jim Hendler
Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint (was Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG) Jonathan Borden
Re: Revisiting structured datatypes was: Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint (was Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG) Jonathan Borden
Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint (was Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG) Jim Hendler
Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint (was Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG) Jonathan Borden
Re: Revisiting structured datatypes was: Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint (was Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG) Jim Hendler
regerets until Aug 4 Guus Schreiber
Re: WOWG: We need your results on the Tests Dan Connolly
Revisiting structured datatypes was: Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint (was Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG) Jonathan Borden
Re: Need someone to answer new comment Jim Hendler
Re: Need someone to answer new comment Dan Connolly
Re: Need someone to answer new comment Ian Horrocks
Need someone to answer new comment Jim Hendler
Re: Proposed response on daml:item Dan Connolly
Proposed response on daml:item Jim Hendler
Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint (was Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG) Dan Connolly
pls elaborate citations in OWL Overview Dan Connolly

Monday, 14 July 2003

Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint (was Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG) Jim Hendler
Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint (was Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG) Jonathan Borden
regrets 24 July due to TAG ftf Dan Connolly
Re: Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG ewallace@cme.nist.gov
Revisiting AllDisjoint (was Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG) Jim Hendler
Re: Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG Jim Hendler
Re: Proposed response to: Unspecified domain,range in App. C of OWL Language Reference Jim Hendler
Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG Jeff Heflin
Proposed response to: Unspecified domain,range in App. C of OWL Language Reference Guus Schreiber

Sunday, 13 July 2003

Protege OWL plugin Jim Hendler

Saturday, 12 July 2003

Re: WOWG: We need your results on the Tests Jos De_Roo
Re: WOWG: We need your results on the Tests Jos De_Roo
Re: regrets for 3 weeks Dlmcg1@aol.com

Friday, 11 July 2003

Re: WOWG: minutes Jul 10 telecon Jos De_Roo
WOWG: We need your results on the Tests Jim Hendler
Re: WOWG: minutes Jul 10 telecon Jim Hendler
Fwd: FYI: homepage for editors Jim Hendler
RE: WOWG: minutes Jul 10 telecon Smith, Michael K
Re: WOWG: minutes Jul 10 telecon Jos De_Roo
Re: WOWG: minutes Jul 10 telecon Guus Schreiber

Thursday, 10 July 2003

Re: examples entailment questions Jos De_Roo
Re: WOWG: minutes Jul 10 telecon Guus Schreiber
Re: WOWG: agenda Jul 10 telecon (revised) Mike Dean
Re: WOWG: minutes Jul 10 telecon Jos De_Roo
Re: examples entailment questions pat hayes
Re: examples entailment questions Christopher Welty
WOWG: minutes Jul 10 telecon Dan Connolly
RDFCore changed rdfs:subClassOf from iff to if Dan Connolly
Link to Editor's Draft of Use Cases and Requirements Jeff Heflin
RE: regrest for 7/10/2003 Marwan Sabbouh
regrest for 7/10/2003 yasser.alsafadi@philips.com
regrets today tim finin
regrets for 3 weeks Frank van Harmelen
WOWG: agenda Jul 10 telecon (revised) Guus Schreiber
Regrets Ora.Lassila@nokia.com

Wednesday, 9 July 2003

probable regrets Jonathan Borden
examples entailment questions Christopher Welty
Regrets: Jul 10 telecon Jerome Euzenat
WOWG: agenda Jul 10 telecon (provisional) Guus Schreiber

Tuesday, 8 July 2003

list archive updates on hold Dan Connolly
Re: daml:item - still confused Guus Schreiber
Jonathan Borden response to 'Next step for OWL - are we ready to move to Candidate and/or Proposed Recommendation' jonathan@openhealth.org

Monday, 7 July 2003

Regrets, 10th July Telecon Sean Bechhofer
Update on closed issue status Jim Hendler
Re: daml:item - still confused Jim Hendler
Re: daml:item - still confused Jeff Heflin
WOWG: WEB-BASED STRAWPOLL on next steps - have your "vote" count Jim Hendler
RE: OWL guide problem? Smith, Michael K

Sunday, 6 July 2003

CALL FOR PAPERS: Workshop on Regulatory Ontologies.. Mustafa Jarrar

Saturday, 5 July 2003

XSD datatypes anchor pat hayes

Friday, 4 July 2003

Re: Layering bug? Jos De_Roo
Re: ill-formed lists in OWL Full Jos De_Roo
ill-formed lists in OWL Full Jeremy Carroll
Regrets 10th July Jeremy Carroll
Re: daml:item - still confused Jeremy Carroll
OWL guide problem? Jeremy Carroll
distinctMembers in OWL Full undefined. Jeremy Carroll
Re: Layering bug? Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 3 July 2003

Re: Layering bug? Jos De_Roo
Jos De Roo response to 'Next step for OWL - are we ready to move to Candidate and/or Proposed Recommendation' jos.deroo@agfa.com
Re: Layering bug? pat hayes
Re: Proposed response to Bob MacGregor on Keys Dan Connolly
Re: daml:item - still confused Jim Hendler
Re: daml:item - still confused Dan Connolly
Re: daml:item - still confused Jos De_Roo
Re: Layering bug? Jos De_Roo
daml:item - still confused Jim Hendler
Proposed response to Bob MacGregor on Keys Jim Hendler
Re: Layering bug? pat hayes
patrick hayes response to 'Next step for OWL - are we ready to move to Candidate and/or Proposed Recommendation' phayes@ihmc.us
Jeremy Carroll response to 'Next step for OWL - are we ready to move to Candidate and/or Proposed Recommendation' Jeremy_Carroll@hp.com
Jos De Roo response to 'Next step for OWL - are we ready to move to Candidate and/or Proposed Recommendation' jos.deroo@agfa.com
Telecon Regrets Mehrdad Omidvari
RE: Layering bug Jeremy Carroll
RE: Layering bug pat hayes
RE: Proposed Test: oneof/inverse Jeremy Carroll
RE: Agenda/Logistics for July 3 telecon--regrets Marwan Sabbouh
Proposed Test: oneof/inverse Sean Bechhofer
Proposal to Close issue 5.3, Semantic Layering Jim Hendler
Re: Test approvals Jeremy Carroll
Re: Layering bug? Jeremy Carroll
Test approvals Jim Hendler
RE: Layering bug? Mehrdad Omidvari
Re: Agenda/Logistics for July 3 telecon Frank van Harmelen
Re: Layering bug? Jeremy Carroll
Re: Layering bug Jeremy Carroll
RE: Layering bug Mehrdad Omidvari
Mike Dean response to 'Next step for OWL - are we ready to move to Candidate and/or Proposed Recommendation' mdean@bbn.com
Re: Agenda/Logistics for July 3 telecon Jim Hendler
Re: Agenda/Logistics for July 3 telecon Jim Hendler

Wednesday, 2 July 2003

Agenda update (was Re: Agenda/Logistics for July 3 telecon) Jim Hendler
Re: Agenda/Logistics for July 3 telecon Dan Connolly
Re: Agenda/Logistics for July 3 telecon Dan Connolly
Re: Layering bug Jos De_Roo
Re: Agenda/Logistics for July 3 telecon Mike Dean
Re: ISSUE 5.3, a non-mon example pat hayes
Re: Agenda/Logistics for July 3 telecon Dan Connolly
Re: Proposed QA Reply (version 2) Dan Connolly
Re: Proposed QA Reply (version 2) Jeremy Carroll
Re: specifying minimal datatypes without reference to "OWL Tools" pat hayes
Re: update on I18N review of RDF, OWL pat hayes
Re: Draft response to Bernard Vatant Dan Connolly
Re: ISSUE 5.3, a non-mon example Jeremy Carroll
Re: ISSUE 5.3, a non-mon example pat hayes
Re: Layering bug pat hayes
Proposed QA Reply (version 2) Sandro Hawke
Draft response to Bernard Vatant pat hayes
2 CfP: KCAP 03 Markup and Annotation Workshop Siegfried Handschuh
small error in S&AS Guus Schreiber
ISSUE 5.3, a non-mon example Jeremy Carroll
Fwd: RDF XMLLiterals reagle-01,-02 Jeremy Carroll
Re: Agenda/Logistics for July 3 telecon Jeremy Carroll
Agenda/Logistics for July 3 telecon Jim Hendler
Fwd: Announcement: New Process Document Operative Jim Hendler

Tuesday, 1 July 2003

regrets: 7/3 telecon Leo Obrst
Re: ISSUE 5.3 some of the HP discussions Dan Connolly
ISSUE 5.3 some of the HP discussions Jeremy Carroll
Review of QA test guidelines Jeremy Carroll
probable regrets telecon 3 July herman.ter.horst@philips.com
Re: specifying minimal datatypes without reference to "OWL Tools" Ian Horrocks
Re: specifying minimal datatypes without reference to "OWL Tools" Jim Hendler
Re: specifying minimal datatypes without reference to "OWL Tools" Dan Connolly
procedural problems with Test last call Jeremy Carroll
procedural problems with Test last call Jeremy Carroll

Last message date: Thursday, 31 July 2003 14:41:53 UTC