- From: Charles White <Charles.White@networkinference.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 16:27:10 -0000
- To: "Guus Schreiber" <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>, "WebOnt WG" <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Also the stuff Jim was talking about last week - matching ontologies - can make use of the labels. > -----Original Message----- > From: Guus Schreiber [mailto:schreiber@cs.vu.nl] > Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 7:49 AM > To: WebOnt WG > Subject: [Fwd: rdfs:label missing in OWL RDF schema for > AnnotationProperty and OntologyProperty] > > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: rdfs:label missing in OWL RDF schema for > AnnotationProperty and OntologyProperty > > Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 05:09:30 -0500 (EST) > > Resent-From: public-webont-comments@w3.org > > Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:09:27 +0100 > > From: J.R. van Ossenbruggen <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl> > > To: public-webont-comments@w3.org > > > > > > A minor issue, but most OWL constructs have a rdfs:label > property in the > > RDF schema (OWL Reference. appendix B). Only > AnnotationProperty and > > OntologyProperty, however, do not have such a label. This seems > > inconsequent and is awkward for RDF tools that use the labels for > > visualizing the schema in a GUI. > > This look to me like a harmless and sensible editorial change > to the RDF > schema. As editor I'm in favor os this change. > > Guus > > > Jacco van Ossenbruggen, CWI Amsterdam > > > > > -- > Free University Amsterdam, Computer Science > De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands > Tel: +31 20 444 7739/7718 > E-mail: schreiber@cs.vu.nl > Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/ > >
Received on Monday, 22 December 2003 11:27:42 UTC