- From: <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:20:20 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org, jjc@hpl.hp.com
>I finally found the QA assessment of the QA WG by the QA WG - they really are >amazingly brazen! > >http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2003/02/qaframe-ops-qawg This is somewhat old. Some of the issues it identifies have been fixed in the CR version. A big one is the availability of a QA Process Document template. This template is an example of the kind of useful resources that our review comments encourage them to produce. I think it is encouraging that they are performing these self-assessments. It is also to their credit that they are requesting reviews such as the one we just performed on the QA Operational Guidelines. It is puzzling though, why they would let the document we reviewed get to a CR state given they have all these tools at their disposal. -Evan [QAPD-TEMPL] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/09/OpsET-qapd-20030912
Received on Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:20:43 UTC