- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:35:23 -0500
- To: ewallace@cme.nist.gov, www-webont-wg@w3.org
- Cc: ewallace@nist.gov
>>> >>>1.4 WebOnt did well without the CR QA Framework >>> >>.... Extensive tests were >>>defined and test results are now available [OWL-TEST-RESULTS] for ten >>>different OWL tools. >> >>actually we ended up with more than that (13 or 14 I think - cannot >>check now as my server is flaky) > >The Tested Systems portion of Sandro's Test Results page lists 13. Shall >we go with this number? how about "more than a dozen" - not that I'm superstitious or anything ... ... > >Need further feedback on the first issue. Will add the others to my edit >queue. I will try to suggest some wording - I like your idea of rewriting to make it clearer what is being objected to (i.e. what we are criticizing that QA did) > >-Evan -- Professor James Hendler http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 240-277-3388 (Cell)
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2003 18:34:56 UTC