- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 17:40:53 -0600
- To: ewallace@cme.nist.gov
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 17:16, ewallace@cme.nist.gov wrote: > All, > > In response to a request [1] from the QA working group forwarded to WebOnt > Jeremy and I have prepared: > I) summary and general WebOnt positions on the QA Framework (see [QAF-INTRO]), > II) a QA Operational Guidelines [QAF-OPS] Case Study document for OWL, > III) specific comments on the [QAF-OPS] document family as used for this > case study. > > We solicit working group review thumbs up here. I was surprised to read that our charter doesn't include testing materials as a deliverable, but I double-checked, and you're right, it doesn't. I think it's in the RDF Core charter. A nit, mostly to provide evidence that I read the whole thing: [...] > One potential test contribution appeared to be discouraged by this (the > handing of copyright to W3C). Offlist, the editor encouraged the submitter > to suggest different terms, but that appears to have presented a hurdle, > and not contribution or further discussion of IPR terms was had. I think you meant "and no contribution or...". -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 16 December 2003 18:40:55 UTC