FTF 4 Comments on OWL Reference Description
This page lists the comments received on the
OWL Reference
between
FTF 3
and
FTF 4.
Specific issues raised are generally summarized,
along with any resolution made to date,
plans for such resolution,
or editor's notes.
Items without a resolution have not been addressed yet
(and represent work in progress).
- Peter Patel-Schneider (15 Jul 2002)
- easy issues addressed in WD; others still pending
- Martin Bryan (8 Aug 2002)
- ability to extend enumeration
- Ed: oneOf is intended to be closed, precluding extension
- need owl:equivalentTo
- duplicate rdf:IDs in examples
- changed first rdf:ID from Asia to Africa
- Ed: "Instances" section should be revisited/updated
- Dave Beckett (22 Aug 2002)
- expand abstract
- links to WDs
- too much bold text
- Ed: agree. Not yet fixed.
- "the index"
- Ed: agree. Not yet fixed.
- rdf:List link
- cite XML Schema Datatypes
- Ed: agree. Not yet fixed. May be affected by pending RDF Core decisions on datatypes.
- explain bullets
- tt consistency
- links
- South_America
- highlight ObjectRestriction, DatatypeRestriction
- inconsistent tt usage
- Notices
- OWL Lite link
- explain bullets
- subdivide section
- consolidate warnings
- ex:isPartOf
- Datatype Values
- changed?
- changed indications replaced by Appendix D
- historical changes
- inline notes
- Ed: probably agree. Not yet fixed.
- owl-ex
- owl:cardinality
- un-numbered sections
- tt consistency
- URIrefs
- Ed: agree. Not yet fixed.
- Pat Emery (5 Sep 2002)
- pluralization
- Dublin Core
- disjointUnionOf
- rdfs:Class vs. owl:Class
- missing "object"
- semantic import
- changed to "impact" for consistency
- equivalentTo and disjointUnionOf
- between and among
- Ed: Too many ands? Possibly change to just among. Not yet fixed.
- Mike Uschold (10 Sep 2002)
- need summary of changes from DAML+OIL to OWL
- Appendix D already added to Editor's Draft
- Jeremy Carroll (18 Sep 2002)
- dc:creator
- importing terms
- disjointUnionOf
$Id: owl-ref-comments-ftf4.html,v 1.4 2002/09/27 16:00:27 mdean Exp $