- From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 11:32:25 -0400
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, "pat hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
I wrote: > > In the presence of an rdfs:subPropertyOf chain, the interpretation of the > literal would, I presume, be the disjunction of the conjunctions of the > datatypes indicated by each of the ranges for each rdfs:subPropertyOf i.e. > > foo rdfs:range (Range(foo) union Range(bar)) ... > > foo rdfs:range _:x > _:x owl:unionOf (xsd:[integer union string], xsd:[string union integer]) > No, that can't be correct... it would have to be something like: john foo "10" . => john foo _:x _:x rdf:type xsd:[integer union string] _:x rdf:type xsd:[string union integer] (or rewrite that to conform to the RDF datatypes version de jure , but hopefully you know what I mean :-)) Jonathan
Received on Saturday, 28 September 2002 11:50:23 UTC