- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:38:59 -0500
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
I will do my best to get this thing finished by noon tomorrow, but the recent movement towards consensus has required a major re-write, and I may not get it finished to spec until the end of the day. There is a most-up-to-date edition always downloadable at http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/RDFS2OWL-F2F.html which I will be changing during the day and will send y'all an email when its done, probably some time later on Friday, then leave it strictly alone for F2F discussion prep. Please anyone for whom this is unworkable, get in touch offline and we can work out something. Pat PS. the document now begins by defining OWL/RDF to be what was called "OWL encoded in fast OWL", ie sticks exactly to the mapping from the abstract syntax, and develops the whole semantics and makes the main layering point purely in that context. Then either you can stop reading, or go on to where it (will) discuss how to 'recognize' OWL/RDF in a wider RDF context, and what happens when you use the semantic conditions on fragments of OWL/RDF that are not abstract-syntax well-formed (hence my earlier query about isolated restriction property triples, BTW) . That corresponds roughly to "fast-OWL". Then it explores further, and looks at what happens if you relax the OWL/RDF restrictions to allow the OWL vocabulary to be used on more, er, relaxed RDF graphs. That goes into what were "weak OWL" and "large OWL" now re-christened and lumped together as varieties of 'wild' OWL/RDF. This way, all the really wild stuff about Russell contradictions and such matters is placed right at the end. I hope this will be more acceptable to everyone. -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 01:38:45 UTC