- From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:37:20 +0200
- To: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <3D931BA0.3050004@swi.psy.uva.nl>
Included is a sketch of a OWL Lite to UML mapping. Guus -- A. Th. Schreiber, SWI, University of Amsterdam http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/usr/Schreiber/home.html
UML presentation syntax for OWL Lite
Guus Schreiber
Sep 26, 2002
0. Introduction
This note contains a textual description of a possible mapping from
OWL Lite to UML. In a follow-up version, example diagrams will be
added. For the moment, consult the previous version [1] to get a feeling
for the UML look-and-feel of OWL Lite.
Compared to the previous version, more use is being made of
stereotypes. This is related to the planned efforts to define a UML
profile for OWL. Such profiles make heavy use of the stereotype
mechanism.
The problems in defining this mapping lay mainly in defining global
characteristics of properties, as UML has a context-specific
interpretation of attributes and associations.
Although this mapping may look complicated, it should be noted that in
practice most the major part of an ontology can be represented with
natural UML equivalents.
1. RDF constructs
rdf:Class
UML class <<rdf:class>
rdf:Property
For object properties:
UML association <<rdf:property>> with navigability arrow on object side
Optional: upgrade to association class
For datatype properties:
Define as UML attribute of the domain class
Note: if you want to use subPropertyOf, you'll have to "promote"
the attribute to an association (class)
NOTE: strong preference to model all properties with
global features (domain, range, functional, ...) as a UML
association class!
rdfs:subClassOf
UML generalization <<rdf:subClassOf>> between classes involved
rdfs:subPropertyOf
UML generalization <<rdf:subPropertyOf>> between properties involved
In this case there should be a strong preference to model the
property as a UML association class (makes the diagram easier to
understand)
rdfs:domain
add <<rdf:domain>> to domain side of the association
rdfs:range
add <<rdf:domain>> to domain side of the association
owl:Individual
UML object notation
2. OWL Lite Equality and Inequality Synopsis
owl:sameClassAs
owl:samePropertyAs
owl:sameIndividualAs
owl:differentIndividualFrom
- create constraint with the corresponding equality/inequality,
e.g. {sameClassAs}
- link this constraint with dependency relation to the elements
involved
3. OWL Lite Property Characteristics Synopsis
owl:inverseOf
Draw dependency link between the two associations involved with
stereotype <<owl:inverseOf>>
owl:TransitiveProperty
owl:SymmetricProperty
owl:FunctionalProperty (unique)
owl:InverseFunctionalProperty (unambiguous)
- add constraint with corresponding name to the UML attribute c.q
association involved.
- alternative 1: stereotype or class-scoped features of property as
UML association class
- alternative 2: link property with dependency link to an explicit
meta property of the corresponding type (see previous version)
owl:allValuesFrom
This is the default UML interpretation; one could add the
corresponding stereotype to the range argument of the association
for clarity
owl:someValuesFrom
Add stereotype <<owl:someValuesFrom>> to the range side of the
association.
4. Restricted cardinality
owl:minCardinality
owl:maxCardinality
owl:cardinality
For object properties: use standard UML association notation:
0..1, 1..1, 0..*,etc.
For datatype properties: attribute cardinality notation, e.g.
"phoneNumber[0..*]: xsd:string"
5. OWL Lite Datatypes
See previous version. For non-basic types, the UML convention for
modelling datatypes as classes <<datatype>> can be used.
6 OWL Lite Header Information Synopsis
owl:imports
- Draw ontologies as packages with <<owl:ontology>> stereotype
- Show import through dependency link with the standard UML
stereotype <<import>>
Dublin Core Metadata
versionInfo
Include UML tagged values for this in the package diagram
These can have the obvious stereotypes
[1] http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/usr/Schreiber/docs/owl-uml/owl-uml.html
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 10:42:06 UTC