- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 05:04:04 +0200
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
(Generally in support)
> PS. I hesitate to even suggest this, but would owl:= and owl:not= be
> legal qnames?
Using the RDF Validator
http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator
with owl:=
reports:
FatalError: An invalid second ':' was found in the element type or attribute
name.[Line = 4, Column = 38]
with owl:not= it reports
FatalError: Element type "owl:not" must be followed by either attribute
specifications, ">" or "/>".[Line = 4, Column = 42]
So sorry, no. (The actual restriction is the NCName production defined in XML
Namespaces - which is approximately an alpha followed by any number of
alphanumerics and some limited range of punctuation ("_" and "-", probably
some others).
Jeremy
Received on Monday, 23 September 2002 23:06:05 UTC