- From: Evan Wallace <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 14:37:02 -0400 (EDT)
- To: horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk, connolly@w3.org
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Dan Connolly responded to Ian's comments on oneOf with: >>Yes, it's not clear that the improvement justifies the cost >>of the change... raising an issue and all that... > It doesn't seem a very high cost to me. Anything that makes the language more accessible to users is well worth the effort. Should I propose a new issue on this or can we cover it with an old one? BTW - I have always found oneOf to be a misleading name for this construct, whereas enumeratedClass identifies its purpose nicely for me. -Evan
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2002 14:37:12 UTC