oneOf

• From: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
• Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 20:38:55 +0100
• To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
• Message-ID: <15739.42831.603501.6408@merlin.oaklands.net>

A minor point in comparison with some of the issues we are currently
wrestling with, but still...

I find myself less and less satisfied with "oneOf" as the name given
to extensionally defined classes. After all, the resulting class
contains all of the enumerated individuals, not just one of
them. EnumeratedClass, as per the abstract syntax, seems much better.

Ian

Received on Sunday, 8 September 2002 20:34:30 UTC