Re: GUIDE: Syntax query re parseType= from Peter F. Patel-Schneider on 2002-09-03 (www-webont-wg@w3.org from September 2002)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 11:46:52 -0400 (EDT)
To: michael.smith@eds.com
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20020903.114652.56692245.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: "Smith, Michael K" <michael.smith@eds.com>
Subject: RE: GUIDE: Syntax query re parseType=
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 10:40:58 -0500 

> 
> There are two things going on with the parseType="rdf:collection" cliche in
> OWL.

[...]

> We could solve this in the OWL syntax, with an OWL tag
> (owl:setType="closed") that translates to an RDF tag.

How would this work?  There is no way in RDF to have a ``tag'' that
prevents one from adding another property to a resource, at least as far as
I can determine.  

[...]

> - Mike

[...]

peter

Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 11:47:05 UTC