- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 31 Oct 2002 17:29:29 -0600
- To: "Peter F. "Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 16:10, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> > Subject: Re: Guide: draft of Oct 31 (goofy TranstiveProperty use) > Date: 31 Oct 2002 15:58:31 -0600 > > [...] > > > While it actually is syntactically > > legal RDF, I'm sure it doesn't say what you meant. > > It says > > locatedIn owl:TransitiveProperty "". > > I would be interested in the derivation of this. Yes, every time I break my "Always cite your source" rule[95], I lose. Every time. I was going from memory, but I see that the RDF issues list confirms... Issue rdfms-empty-property-elements: The interpretation of empty property elements is unclear. http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-empty-property-elements And I think it's reasonably clear in the syntax spec... http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#emptyPropertyElt esp. test002 for this issue http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-empty-property-elements/test002.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-empty-property-elements/test002.nt [95] http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=CONNOLLY.95Sep22103458%40w3.org -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2002 18:29:09 UTC