Re: Guide: draft of Oct 31 from Peter F. Patel-Schneider on 2002-10-31 (www-webont-wg@w3.org from October 2002)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:25:37 -0500 (EST)
To: michael.smith@eds.com
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20021031.172537.119273479.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

I would lean towards just not using rdf:ID, but would not be against such
stylistic recommendations.

peter



From: "Smith, Michael K" <michael.smith@eds.com>
Subject: RE: Guide: draft of Oct 31
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:19:01 -0600

> 
> > PS: In general, I think that OWL should completely avoid rdf:ID, instead
> >     using RDF:about.
> 
> Should the Guide suggest this as good practice?
> 
> - Mike

Received on Thursday, 31 October 2002 17:25:48 UTC