- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 31 Oct 2002 13:41:53 -0600
- To: "Peter F. "Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
I think it's great to see this coming together... some specific questions about the status... On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 13:18, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > The current version of the semantics document, which contains > 1/ the abstract syntax, > 2/ the direct model theory, > 3/ the mapping from abstract syntax to n-triples, and > 4/ the RDFS-compatible model theory, > is available as a multi-part document at > http://www-db.research.bell-labs.com/user/pfps/owl/semantics.html This carries Pat's name (as well as Ian's an Franks) without qualification, but I'd like confirmation that he's seen (or otherwise agreed to) this version. i.e. is it a candidate for discharging this action? "ACTION Peter Patel-Schneider/Pat Hayes: draft OWL semantics, including the "2 technical bits" [should also address issues 4.6, 5.9, 5.22]" -- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/ftf4#Semantic I don't see 5.9 nor 5.22 in "1.2. Stances Taken on OWL Issues" http://www-db.research.bell-labs.com/user/pfps/owl/semantics.html#1.2 but I understand from your message of 31 Oct 2002 13:40:49 -0500 that this draft *does* (propose to) address issue 5.9. And this draft does address 5.22-owl:Class-still-needed to my satisfaction, in (among other places) "4.1. Definition of OWL Knowledge Bases in Triple Form" http://www-db.research.bell-labs.com/user/pfps/owl/mapping.html#4.1 > and as a single-part document (suitable for printing, but some links go to > the multi-part document) at > http://www-db.research.bell-labs.com/user/pfps/owl/semantics-all.html > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider > Bell Labs Research -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2002 14:41:33 UTC