- From: Deborah McGuinness <dlm@ksl.Stanford.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:42:09 -0800
- To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl>
- CC: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
i support a 1-d presentation and OWL Lite -> OWL DL -> OWL Full d Guus Schreiber wrote: > > ACTION: Guus, Frank: to move the issue forward, will write up 1-d > > and 2-d views to make clearer to users. > > Frank and I discussed this. We concluded the following: > > - it is really a 2-d space: expressivity (Lite vs Full) and semantics > (Fast and Large) > - for presentation purposes a 1-d presentation is highly preferable > - in the proposal for 1-d: LiteFast -> FullFast -> FullLarge we have no > explicit name for LiteLarge. This might be a problem for RDF users/tool > developers upgrading to OWL, as LiteLarge would be their natural place > to start. > - however: we need to release a new version of the WDs soon which MUST > include a description of this issue > > Therefore a procedural proposal could be: > - for the moment: use the 1-d descruption LiteFast -> FullFast -> > FullLarge in the WDs > - revisit this issue based on feedback on this from the public > > Guus > > -- > A. Th. Schreiber, SWI, University of Amsterdam > http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/usr/Schreiber/home.html -- Deborah L. McGuinness Knowledge Systems Laboratory Gates Computer Science Building, 2A Room 241 Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-9020 email: dlm@ksl.stanford.edu URL: http://ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm (voice) 650 723 9770 (stanford fax) 650 725 5850 (computer fax) 801 705 0941
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2002 13:42:57 UTC