- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:40:49 -0500 (EST)
- To: hendler@cs.umd.edu
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Given that we didn't get around to the semantics document, here is what I was going to bring up today. peter Points with respect to the New Semantics Document - Move forward to make this a WG document? - Organization - Introduction - Abstract Syntax - Direct Model-Theoretic Semantics - Mapping to RDF Syntax - RDFS-Compatible Model-Theoretic Semantics - Commonalities, Fast OWL, Large OWL - Correspondence between Abstract OWL and Fast OWL (Informative) * What else is needed? * What should be removed? - Stances on Open Issues - 4.4 - Extra Logical Feature Set - only imports - annotations - easy to handle in abstract syntax - harder in RDF syntax (and not yet done) - 4.6 - equivalentTo - no equivalentTo anywhere - sameIndividualAs carries very similar meaning in Large OWL * I believe that this treatment is a basis for closing the issue - 5.5 - Lists are handled directly, and in a minimal fashion - I believe that it works in Fast OWL * I believe that this treatment is a basis for closing the issue - 5.6 - imports - only partly handled - easy to handle in abstract syntax, as in my email message - harder in RDF syntax (and not yet done) - 5.9 - malformed restrictions - currently different from DAML+OIL - a restriction with two onProperties causes the properties to be identified (as if there was a samePropertyAs axiom) - should this be changed back to the DAML+OIL situation - a restriction with multiple onProperties or other properties implies an equality between the satisfying sets of individuals * can go either way, but the change from DAML+OIL requires a decision - 5.19 - classes as instances - allowed in Large OWL, forbidden in Fast OWL * this is in accordance with the direction agreed on at the F2F - 5.7 - no datatype range constructs - 5.8 - datatypes handled in a similar manner to current RDF proposal - 5.13 - internet media type - no stance - 5.14 - ontology versioning - no solution - 5.17 - XML presentation syntax - not relevant - 5.18 - unique names assumption - no solution WARNING: I will be making proposals based on this document.
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2002 13:40:59 UTC