- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:40:49 -0500 (EST)
- To: hendler@cs.umd.edu
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Given that we didn't get around to the semantics document, here is what I
was going to bring up today.
peter
Points with respect to the New Semantics Document
- Move forward to make this a WG document?
- Organization
- Introduction
- Abstract Syntax
- Direct Model-Theoretic Semantics
- Mapping to RDF Syntax
- RDFS-Compatible Model-Theoretic Semantics
- Commonalities, Fast OWL, Large OWL
- Correspondence between Abstract OWL and Fast OWL (Informative)
* What else is needed?
* What should be removed?
- Stances on Open Issues
- 4.4 - Extra Logical Feature Set - only imports
- annotations - easy to handle in abstract syntax
- harder in RDF syntax (and not yet done)
- 4.6 - equivalentTo - no equivalentTo anywhere
- sameIndividualAs carries very similar meaning in Large OWL
* I believe that this treatment is a basis for closing the issue
- 5.5 - Lists are handled directly, and in a minimal fashion
- I believe that it works in Fast OWL
* I believe that this treatment is a basis for closing the issue
- 5.6 - imports - only partly handled
- easy to handle in abstract syntax, as in my email message
- harder in RDF syntax (and not yet done)
- 5.9 - malformed restrictions
- currently different from DAML+OIL
- a restriction with two onProperties causes the properties to
be identified (as if there was a samePropertyAs axiom)
- should this be changed back to the DAML+OIL situation
- a restriction with multiple onProperties or other properties
implies an equality between the satisfying sets of individuals
* can go either way, but the change from DAML+OIL requires a decision
- 5.19 - classes as instances
- allowed in Large OWL, forbidden in Fast OWL
* this is in accordance with the direction agreed on at the F2F
- 5.7 - no datatype range constructs
- 5.8 - datatypes handled in a similar manner to current RDF proposal
- 5.13 - internet media type - no stance
- 5.14 - ontology versioning - no solution
- 5.17 - XML presentation syntax - not relevant
- 5.18 - unique names assumption - no solution
WARNING: I will be making proposals based on this document.
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2002 13:40:59 UTC