RE: LANG: Proposal to close issue 5.17 - XML syntax

> Er... we have a normative RDF/XML syntax. That's not
> at issue here.

So, the normative RDF/XML syntax defines the OWL tags?

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Connolly [mailto:connolly@w3.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:33 PM
To: Smith, Michael K
Cc: Jim Hendler; webont
Subject: RE: LANG: Proposal to close issue 5.17 - XML syntax


On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 15:24, Smith, Michael K wrote:
> 
> The one thing I find odd about this is that our documents are using
examples
> that depend on an XML syntax.

Er... we have a normative RDF/XML syntax. That's not
at issue here.

What's at issue here is a non-normative XML presentation
syntax.

>  What mechanism are we going to use to ensure
> document consistency if we leave this for some future time?

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2002 18:30:39 UTC