- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:57:26 +0100
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
> > 2: I was surprised at the use of N-triples (in section 4) > What surprised you? This section (the mapping from the abstract syntax to > the RDF syntax) has been around for quite some time. I'm not interested in > doing the mental conniptions to translate from the abstract syntax to > RDF/XML, Heaven forbid you use RDF/XML! (I realize that could be read with sarcasm, that I don't intend). No I was more wondering just talking about fairly abstract triples. RDF is fairly abstract really. The bit about mapping to N-triples that I think is a waste of time is to do with forcing a literal to sit on one line, and all the escaping etc that you are supposed to do. It's needed, but it is syntactic grunge that is wholly irrelevant to OWL. I haven't reviewed this text before - I guess it went out in our Abstract Syntax WD ... I didn't really take that one seriously, sorry. Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2002 08:58:17 UTC