Re: shorthand notation for OWL Lite constraints from Dan Connolly on 2002-10-11 (www-webont-wg@w3.org from October 2002)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 11 Oct 2002 08:16:29 -0500
To: Christopher Welty <welty@us.ibm.com>
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1034342189.27708.11.camel@dirk>

On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 09:06, Christopher Welty wrote:
[...]
> With the shorthand notation described above, one could say instead:
> 
> <owl:class rdf:ID=SoccerTeam>
>   <rdfs:subClassOf>
>    <owl:hasExactlyOne rdf:resource="goalie"/>
>   </rdfs:subClassOf>
> </owl:class>

Actually, just:

<owl:Class rdf:ID="SoccerTeam">
  <owl:hasExactlyOne rdf:resource="#goalie"/>
</owl:Class>

or, in triple form:

	ex:SoccerTeam owl:hasExactlyOne ex:goalie.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Friday, 11 October 2002 09:15:58 UTC