- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 17:52:38 +0100
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Thanks for the feedback Dan, I'll do more justice tomorrow. > Case in point, test 003: > > If prop is an owl:FunctionalProperty, then its inverse > is an owl:InverseFunctionalProperty. > > which part of what spec supports that inference? > > Yeah, that's only "PROPOSED" not approved ...(unless I screwed up) My take was that both of Pat's proposals and Peter's proposal has that as true. Although the text could be improved. e.g. "its inverse, if any," Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2002 12:49:51 UTC