W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: LANG: owl:import - Two Proposals

From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:28:45 -0400
Message-Id: <p05111709b9c20473e374@[]>
To: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
Cc: WebOnt <www-webont-wg@w3.org>

>  > >>  Oh well. That's an artifact of the decision to use RDF, 
>however we decided
>>  >>  to use RDF/XML at F2F 2.
>>  >
>>  >Sure this isn't a deal-breaker, but because of it, proposal #1 has the
>>  >advantage of us not having to constantly answer the question "So tell me
>>  >again why the contents of an ontology are described outside of the
>>  ><Ontology> tag?"
>>  Not sure I understand, reopening decisions isn't to be taken lightly
>I don't see it as reopening the decision. The decision is pretty vague,
>so I guess it comes down to a matter of interpretation.

Sorry what part of
Resolved: XML/RDF will be the exchange format for OWL.
do you not understand?
Professor James Hendler				  hendler@cs.umd.edu
Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies	  301-405-2696
Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab.	  301-405-6707 (Fax)
Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742	  240-731-3822 (Cell)
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2002 10:28:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:04:36 UTC