- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:07:37 +0100
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Attn: Patel-Schneider > [[ > VOTE. A vote was taken on whether or not to approve the OWL test cases > as described in jjc's email. The vote passed with one opposed (pfps), > one abstention (ChrisW) and the rest positive. > ]] > -- 29Aug minutes > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Sep/0059.html > > I expect the WG to work that one out too. But Peter, > you have the right to include a formal objection > if we don't eventually work things out to your satisfaction. > Peter I have worked at understanding your objections, and hope that they have now been addressed by, the test doc for review (assuming that it is acceptable to the WG) - vis: - the descriptions of those tests - and the process Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2002 04:04:21 UTC