- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 18:12:03 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
> > > 4/ OWL can use XML Schema non-list simple types defined at the top > > > level of an XML Schema document and given a name, by using the URI > > > reference constructed from the URI of the document and the > > > local name of > > > the simple type. > > Hmmm, we should co-ordinate with RDF Core and XML Schema WGs on > this one. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Nov/att-0092/02-index#ur is > If I expected RDF Core to make any progress on this issue, I would defer to > them. :-( That unsmiley is realistic ... We have an objective: O4. Range constraints on data types http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-webont-req-20020708/#obj-range-constraints which requires these URIs. It is the responsibility of the XML Schema WG to provide them, but they have bitten off a bigger problem: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Oct/att-0050/01-pa rt The DAML+OIL solution is proven, but not blessed by an appropriate group. We are not really the appropriate group to bless it. What is the best way of persuading XML Schema WG to do so? Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2002 12:12:16 UTC