it is my understanding/experience that that is parsing i.e. we get triples such as :WineColor rdf:type owl:Class . :WineColor rdfs:subClassOf :WineDescriptor . :WineColor owl:oneOf _:a1 . ... :White rdf:type owl:Thing . :Rose rdf:type owl:Thing . :Red rdf:type owl:Thing . -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy To: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org> .uva.nl> cc: Jan Wielemaker <jan@swi.psy.uva.nl> Sent by: Subject: GUIDE: small comment on WD www-webont-wg-requ est@w3.org 11/15/2002 05:14 PM We came across the following problerm. In the Guide the follwoing example [1] is given of "onOf": <owl:Class rdf:ID="WineColor"> <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#WineDescriptor"/> <owl:oneOf rdf:parseType="Collection"> <owl:Thing rdf:about="#White"/> <owl:Thing rdf:about="#Rose"/> <owl:Thing rdf:about="#Red"/> </owl:oneOf> </owl:Class> Our parser has problems with this. The RDF Syntax doc appears to say this is not the right syntax [2]. Collections should consist of node elements, e.g.: <rdf:Description rdf:about="#White"/> Correct? A minor point is that in the wine.owl file <owl:Item> is used instaed of <owl:Thing>. Guus [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-owl-guide-20021104/#EnumeratedClasses [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20021108/#section-Syntax-parsetype-Collection -- A. Th. Schreiber, SWI, University of Amsterdam, http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/usr/Schreiber/home.htmlReceived on Friday, 15 November 2002 13:31:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:04:38 UTC