Re: PROPOSAL to close issue 4.6

• From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
• Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 09:24:29 -0500 (EST)
• To: heflin@cse.lehigh.edu
• Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <20021105.092429.08259569.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL to close issue 4.6 [was Re: SEM: peeking at approach to 4.6 EquivalentTo]
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 14:54:03 -0500

> I could live with this, but would be much happier if we also had a
> generic sameAs property that could be used in place of the three longer
> named properties. I know this has come up before. Note, if someone used
> sameAs between a property and a class in OWL/DL, this would be no
> different than if they declared the same ID to be of both type Class and
> Property. 
> 
> Jeff

What is the meaning of this property going to be in the abstract syntax and
in the n-triples syntax, both for OWL/DL and OWL/Full?   

peter

Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2002 09:24:40 UTC